Govind Asokan

Govind Asokan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and injunctions. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Govind Asokan has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rectification	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction of terms	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fixed term contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Notice period	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Reasonable notice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Govind Asokan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Govind Asokan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson	2 cases	50% of cases	Walsh v Peregrine: Wrongful Termination & Fixed-Term Contract Dispute(May 2003) Fineplas Holdings Pte Ltd v Sitra Wood Products: Lifting of Interim Injunction(Feb 2001)
Gabriel Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Multistar Holdings Ltd v Geocon Piling: Amendment of Pleadings & Limitation Periods(Jan 2016)
Rodyk and Davidson	1 cases	25% of cases	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent(Dec 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Govind Asokan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Govind Asokan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Multistar Holdings Ltd v Geocon Piling: Amendment of Pleadings & Limitation Periods 10 Jan 2016 Multistar Holdings Ltd (Appellant)Lost	10 Jan 2016	Multistar Holdings Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Projector SA v Marubeni: Amendment of Notice of Appeal and Prejudice to Respondent 02 Dec 2004 Projector SA (Appellant, Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2004	Projector SA (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; order made on 16 July 2004 by Woo J set aside. Leave granted to amend notice of appeal (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Walsh v Peregrine: Wrongful Termination & Fixed-Term Contract Dispute 28 May 2003 Walsh Terence William (Plaintiff)Lost	28 May 2003	Walsh Terence William (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action for wrongful termination was dismissed with costs.
4	Fineplas Holdings Pte Ltd v Sitra Wood Products: Lifting of Interim Injunction 01 Feb 2001 Sitra Wood Products Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	01 Feb 2001	Sitra Wood Products Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for the interlocutory injunction was dismissed.