Grace Chacko

Grace Chacko is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in divorce and family law. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Grace Chacko has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in divorce and family law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Divorce	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Contempt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Home	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Grace Chacko has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Grace Chacko has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Grace Chacko Law Practice	2 cases	40% of cases	VRI v VRH: Appeal Against Contempt Order for Breaching Child Access Order(Feb 2023) VTF v VTG: Appeal to Rescind Interim Judgment in Divorce Based on Non-Disclosure of Wife's Lesbian Relationship(Jul 2021)
Synergy Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	XZ v YA: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings(Nov 2011)
Aye Cheng & Grace	1 cases	20% of cases	XZ v YA: Appeal for Downward Variation of Maintenance Order Based on Misrepresentation(Mar 2009)
Peter Low Tang & Belinda Ang	1 cases	20% of cases	Just Gems Ltd v Ooi: Failed Share Transfer & Recovery of Funds(Jan 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Grace Chacko's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Grace Chacko's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2
USD	550,000.00	550,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	VRI v VRH: Appeal Against Contempt Order for Breaching Child Access Order 28 Feb 2023 VRH (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	28 Feb 2023	VRH (Respondent, Plaintiff): Successful in Defending AppealSuccessfully defended the appeal against the committal order.
2	VTF v VTG: Appeal to Rescind Interim Judgment in Divorce Based on Non-Disclosure of Wife's Lesbian Relationship 22 Jul 2021 VTF (Appellant)Lost	22 Jul 2021	VTF (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe Husband's appeal to rescind the interim judgment was dismissed.
3	XZ v YA: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance Dispute in Divorce Proceedings 10 Nov 2011 XZ (Respondent)Partial	10 Nov 2011	XZ (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. The appeal against the division of matrimonial property was dismissed. The maintenance order was varied downwards. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	XZ v YA: Appeal for Downward Variation of Maintenance Order Based on Misrepresentation 03 Mar 2009 YA (Respondent)Partial	03 Mar 2009	YA (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, resulting in a reduction of monthly maintenance received (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Just Gems Ltd v Ooi: Failed Share Transfer & Recovery of Funds 30 Jan 2002 Just Gems Limited (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2002	Just Gems Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff against the first defendant in the sum of US$550,000. The first defendant shall pay interest on the total sum of US$550,000 at 6% p.a. from the date of the writ.