Gregory Gan

Gregory Gan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 78.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gregory Gan has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	9 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Penetration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Attempted Rape	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Rape	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Women’s Charter	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Furnishing False Information	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bias and Prejudice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Gan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gregory Gan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	9 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Adam bin Mohamed Noor: Workplace Safety and Health Act Violation(Jan 2024) Tham Saik Mun Simon v Public Prosecutor: Drink-Driving & Bonjela Gel Defence(Jun 2023) PP v Gunasilan Rajenthiran: Drug Importation, Misuse of Drugs Act, Voluntariness of Statements(Jul 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gregory Gan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 1 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	22%
Won	72.3 parties avg	2.3	78%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gregory Gan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(22%)	22%
Won	7(78%)	78%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v. Adam bin Mohamed Noor: Workplace Safety and Health Act Violation 30 Jan 2024 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2024	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the DJ's decision to acquit the Accused was allowed.
2	Tham Saik Mun Simon v Public Prosecutor: Drink-Driving & Bonjela Gel Defence 26 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Respondent successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence for the Drink-Driving Charge.
3	PP v Gunasilan Rajenthiran: Drug Importation, Misuse of Drugs Act, Voluntariness of Statements 06 Jul 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	06 Jul 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction UpheldThe accused was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning.
4	Public Prosecutor v. Muhammad Alif bin Ab Rahim: Rape and Sexual Assault Sentencing 11 May 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	11 May 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 28 years' imprisonment and 24 strokes of the cane.
5	Asep Ardiansyah v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Rape & Sexual Penetration of Intoxicated Complainant 23 Jul 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Jul 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction of the appellant.
6	Prakash s/o Manikam v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Sentence for Voluntarily Causing Hurt 07 Jan 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	07 Jan 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was substituted with a lighter sentence.
7	Public Prosecutor v Ridhaudin Ridhwan: Rape, Attempted Rape, Sexual Penetration, and Outrage of Modesty 18 Aug 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Aug 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Conviction and sentencing of the accused personsThe Prosecution successfully secured convictions and sentences for all accused persons on various charges.
8	A Karthik v Public Prosecutor: Abetment by Conspiracy & Probation for Young Offenders 12 Sep 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	12 Sep 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's request for imprisonment was not granted.
9	Wu Guo Hao Max v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Conviction for Furnishing False Information 21 Nov 2013 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Nov 2013	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Wu Guo Hao Max was dismissed.