Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy

Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and sentencing. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Careless Driving	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drink Driving	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ratification	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Assignment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contractual Terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Traffic Violations	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Chan Chow Chuen v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Careless Driving Sentence(Nov 2024) Asidokona Mining Resources v Alternative Advisors: Ratification & Loan Agreement Dispute(Feb 2023) Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information(Apr 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.2
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gregory Vijayendran Ganesamoorthy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chan Chow Chuen v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Careless Driving Sentence 21 Nov 2024 Chan Chow Chuen (Appellant)Won	21 Nov 2024	Chan Chow Chuen (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the sentence of 5 days imprisonment for careless driving was allowed. The imprisonment was substituted with a fine of $11,000. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Asidokona Mining Resources v Alternative Advisors: Ratification & Loan Agreement Dispute 02 Feb 2023 Soh Sai Kiang (Appellant, Defendant)Won	02 Feb 2023	Soh Sai Kiang (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the appellants are not required to pay the principal sum of the loan and interest.
3	Pacific Prime v Lee Suet Fern: Injunction Variation for Misuse of Confidential Information 17 Apr 2022 Ng Lee Teng, Nellie (Defendant)Partial	17 Apr 2022	Ng Lee Teng, Nellie (Defendant): Application to discharge injunction partially allowedThe defendant's application to discharge the non-solicitation injunctions and the confidentiality injunctions was dismissed. The defendant was allowed to vary paragraphs 1(b), 2(a) and 3(b) of the Injunction Order to limit the duration of the non-solicitation injunction to six months, and to make their proposed amendments to paragraphs 2(b) and 3(a) of the Injunction Order to limit the scope of the confidentiality injunctions.
4	Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology v Stansfield College: Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation in Education Collaboration 23 Oct 2018 Stansfield College Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Oct 2018	Stansfield College Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Dismissed in partCounterclaim dismissed save for one breach of contract by the plaintiff. Damages for the breach will be assessed separately.