H T Sam

H T Sam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and summary judgement. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

H T Sam has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and disclosure of documents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Amendments	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	H T Sam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

H T Sam has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
H T Sam & Co	1 cases	33% of cases	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Extension of Time for Summary Judgment Application(Jul 2004)
H T Sam and Co	1 cases	33% of cases	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Summary Judgment Time Limit and Amendment of Pleadings(Aug 2004)
H T Sam and Company	1 cases	33% of cases	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Striking Out Summary Judgment Application for Breach of Rules of Court(Aug 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of H T Sam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of H T Sam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Summary Judgment Time Limit and Amendment of Pleadings 30 Aug 2004 Sin Yong Constructor Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	30 Aug 2004	Sin Yong Constructor Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Successful in resisting appealThe third defendant successfully resisted the plaintiff's appeal and was awarded costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Striking Out Summary Judgment Application for Breach of Rules of Court 05 Aug 2004 Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	05 Aug 2004	Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application set asideApplication for summary judgment on their counterclaim set aside in its entirety. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	United Engineers v Lee Lip Hiong: Extension of Time for Summary Judgment Application 20 Jul 2004 Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	20 Jul 2004	Sin Yong Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant, Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for extension of time to file and serve an application under Order 14 for summary judgment on their counterclaim against United Engineers was refused.