Han Wah Teng

Han Wah Teng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 8% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Han Wah Teng has demonstrated expertise across 62 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	4 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Amendment of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-compliance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum of costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Choses in Action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance and champerty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bare right to litigate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Non-assignment clauses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Submission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Industry	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Practising certificate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Han Wah Teng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Han Wah Teng has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
CTLC Law Corporation	9 cases	75% of cases	W. Power Group EOOD v Ming Yang Wind Power: Striking Out & Amendment in Joint Venture Dispute(Oct 2024) WNW v WNX: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long-Term Marriage(Dec 2023) W. Power Group EOOD v. Ming Yang Wind Power: Security for Costs Application(Nov 2023)
Nanyang Law LLC	2 cases	17% of cases	Taka Jewellery Pte Ltd v Tan Choon Sim: Fraud Claim and Employee Theft Dispute(Aug 2012) PH Hydraulics v Intrepid Offshore: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Non-Competition Clause Dispute(Jun 2012)
Keystone Law Corporation	1 cases	8% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Mahadevan Lukshumayeh: Practicing as Advocate and Solicitor Without Valid Practicing Certificate(Jul 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Han Wah Teng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (8%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	8%
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2012	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Han Wah Teng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(8%)	8%
Partial	1(8%)	8%
Won	4(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	736,434.05	92,054.268 cases	8

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	W. Power Group EOOD v Ming Yang Wind Power: Striking Out & Amendment in Joint Venture Dispute 14 Oct 2024 W. Power Group EOOD (Claimant)Lost	14 Oct 2024	W. Power Group EOOD (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed in its entirety; W. Power Group EOOD to pay Ming Yang Wind Power (International) Co. Ltd's costs of the proceedings (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	WNW v WNX: Division of Matrimonial Assets in Long-Term Marriage 26 Dec 2023 WNX (Respondent)Partial	26 Dec 2023	WNX (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partAppeal dismissed regarding the inclusion of the full value of the Matrimonial Flat. Appeal allowed in part regarding the weightage of direct and indirect contributions, resulting in the Wife needing to pay $9,363.87 to the Husband (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	W. Power Group EOOD v. Ming Yang Wind Power: Security for Costs Application 09 Nov 2023 W. Power Group EOOD (Claimant)Lost	09 Nov 2023	W. Power Group EOOD (Claimant): Order to pay costsClaimant ordered to pay the Defendant’s costs of the application in SUM 13 assessed in the amount of $6,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Spamhaus Technology Ltd v Reputation Administration Service: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Contract Formation 16 Oct 2023 Spamhaus Technology Ltd (Claimant, Appellant)Won	16 Oct 2023	Spamhaus Technology Ltd (Claimant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed and Default Judgment restored. Costs of the appeal fixed at $4,000 all-in to be paid by the respondent to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	W. Power Group EOOD v. Ming Yang Wind Power: Security for Costs in Wind Farm Joint Venture Dispute 28 Sep 2023 W. Power Group EOOD (Claimant)Lost	28 Sep 2023	W. Power Group EOOD (Claimant): Security for costs orderedClaimant ordered to provide security of SGD 70,000 for the defendant's costs up to the commencement of trial. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Gravitas International v Invictus Group: Assignment of Rights, Non-Assignment Clauses, and Inducement of Breach of Contract 05 Jan 2022 Invictus Group Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	05 Jan 2022	Invictus Group Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the Defendant; Plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
7	Lim Bee Lan v Lee Juan Loong: Fraudulent & Negligent Misrepresentation in ABT Investment 13 Oct 2021 Lee Juan Loong (Defendant)Lost	13 Oct 2021	Lee Juan Loong (Defendant): Claim UpheldJudgment against the Defendant; the Defendants are to pay the Plaintiff the sum of S$298,535.09, which is the difference between the sum invested by the Plaintiff for 5% of ABT shares and the actual value of those shares at the time of investment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Reputation Administration Service v Spamhaus Technology: Stay of Proceedings & Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 10 May 2021 Spamhaus Technology Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	10 May 2021	Spamhaus Technology Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the lower court's decision that the stay application should not be granted.
9	Reputation Administration Service Pte Ltd v Spamhaus Technology Ltd: Leave to Appeal Decision on Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause 02 Nov 2020 Spamhaus Technology Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	02 Nov 2020	Spamhaus Technology Ltd (Respondent): Leave to appeal grantedLeave to appeal granted to the applicant; costs reserved.
10	Taka Jewellery Pte Ltd v Tan Choon Sim: Fraud Claim and Employee Theft Dispute 13 Aug 2012 Taka Jewellery Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	13 Aug 2012	Taka Jewellery Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for $300,000 was dismissed.
11	PH Hydraulics v Intrepid Offshore: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Non-Competition Clause Dispute 26 Jun 2012 Rinov Herawan (Defendant)Lost	26 Jun 2012	Rinov Herawan (Defendant): Liable for copyright infringement and breach of confidentialityDefendant found liable for copyright infringement and breach of confidentiality; statutory damages of $25,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Law Society of Singapore v Mahadevan Lukshumayeh: Practicing as Advocate and Solicitor Without Valid Practicing Certificate 07 Jul 2008 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	07 Jul 2008	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Order to show cause grantedThe Law Society's application for an order to show cause was granted, and the respondents were prohibited from applying for a practicing certificate for a specified period. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.