Haridass Ajaib

Haridass Ajaib is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 17 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and shipping law. Their track record shows a 41.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 6% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated expertise across 61 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	16 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	7 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Endangered Species Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Trade	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Environmental Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proofs of debt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditor's liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal statutes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voyage charterparties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual Lien	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arrived ship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Consent Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Haridass Ajaib has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Haridass Ajaib has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Haridass Ho & Partners	16 cases	94% of cases	Kong Hoo v Public Prosecutor: Interpreting 'In Transit' under the Endangered Species Act(Apr 2019) EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy by Unlawful Means, Mental Element, Pleading & Proof of Foreign Law(Nov 2013) TMM v Pacific Richfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Vessel Sale Dispute(Sep 2013)
Haridass Ho and Partners	1 cases	6% of cases	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance, Perils of the Sea & Unseaworthiness(Dec 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Haridass Ajaib's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.7
Complex Cases: 1 (6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	72.3 parties avg	2.3	41%
Neutral	211.8 parties avg	11.8	12%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Won	72.7 parties avg	2.7	41%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	211.9 parties avg	11.9
2002	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Haridass Ajaib's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	7(41%)	41%
Neutral	2(12%)	12%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	7(41%)	41%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	700,000.00	77,777.789 cases	9
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%)
2003	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 17 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kong Hoo v Public Prosecutor: Interpreting 'In Transit' under the Endangered Species Act 07 Apr 2019 Wong Wee Keong (Applicant)Won	07 Apr 2019	Wong Wee Keong (Applicant): Appeal AllowedConviction quashed and sentence set aside.
2	EFT Holdings v Marinteknik: Conspiracy by Unlawful Means, Mental Element, Pleading & Proof of Foreign Law 28 Nov 2013 Priscilla Lim (Respondent)Won	28 Nov 2013	Priscilla Lim (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent.
3	TMM v Pacific Richfield: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Vessel Sale Dispute 22 Sep 2013 Pacific Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	22 Sep 2013	Pacific Richfield Marine Pte Ltd (Respondent): Counterclaim AllowedCounterclaim for the Deposit to be released by Platou to PRM was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Valency International Trading v Alton International Resources: Contract Law & Breach 11 May 2011 Valency International Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	11 May 2011	Valency International Trading Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs in the cause, here and below. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Agrosin Pte Ltd v Martynov Igor: Breach of Director's Duties, Understated Costs, and Unpaid Salary Dispute 25 Jun 2009 Agrosin Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	25 Jun 2009	Agrosin Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Interlocutory judgment grantedInterlocutory judgment granted with damages to be assessed together with interest at 5.33% from 22 February 2007. The currency is assumed to be USD as the losses were claimed in USD.
6	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance Coverage for Tugboat Loss at Sea 10 Sep 2006 Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	10 Sep 2006	Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedJudgment for Marina Offshore in the sum of $420,000 against China Insurance and in the sum of $280,000 against AXA (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Marina Offshore v China Insurance: Marine Insurance, Perils of the Sea & Unseaworthiness 29 Dec 2005 Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Dec 2005	Marina Offshore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for indemnity was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Feoso v Faith Maritime: Demurrage Lien on Cargo Without Bill of Lading Ownership 24 Aug 2003 Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	24 Aug 2003	Feoso (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to bear the costs of Faith. Security for costs, together with any accrued interest, were ordered to be released to Faith to account of its costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah v The Liquidators of Baring Futures: Contractual Indemnity & Auditors' Liability 06 Jul 2003 Chaly Chee Kheong Mah (Appellant)Lost	06 Jul 2003	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with appellants to pay 2/3 of the costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Afro Asia Shipping v Haridass Ho: Striking Out Action & Interpretation of Consent Order 09 Feb 2003 Haridass Ho & Partners (Defendant, Respondent)Won	09 Feb 2003	Haridass Ho & Partners (Defendant, Respondent): Claim DismissedClaim against the first defendant was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Deloitte & Touche v Baring Futures: Indemnification for Legal Costs & Priority of Claims in Liquidation 18 Nov 2002 Chaly Chee Kheong Mah, Po'ad bin Shaik Abu Bakar Mattar & 34 others practising in the name and style of Deloitte & Touche (Applicant)Lost	18 Nov 2002	Chaly Chee Kheong Mah, Po'ad bin Shaik Abu Bakar Mattar & 34 others practising in the name and style of Deloitte & Touche (Applicant): Motions dismissedMotions for indemnification of legal costs and priority of claims in liquidation were dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
12	Bandung Shipping v Keppel Tatlee: Rights of Suit Under Bills of Lading Act 29 Oct 2002 Keppel Tatlee Bank Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	29 Oct 2002	Keppel Tatlee Bank Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe statement of claim was struck out, and the action was dismissed.
13	The Patraikos 2: Cargo Damage Claim - Breach of Hague Rules & Seaworthiness 08 May 2002 Chester Shipping Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 May 2002	Chester Shipping Co Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe defendants' counterclaim is dismissed with costs. The Lloyd`s Average Bonds/Guarantees furnished by the plaintiffs/their underwriters shall be returned by the defendants together with whatever security for costs previously given by the former. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Baring Futures v Deloitte & Touche: Scheme of Arrangement & Auditors' Indemnity Costs 27 Jan 2002 Deloitte & Touche Singapore (Applicant)Neutral	27 Jan 2002	Deloitte & Touche Singapore (Applicant): Determination of indemnity and super-priority claims deferredThe court deferred determination of the indemnity and super-priority or, alternatively, the expense claims of Deloitte & Touche Singapore until three events have come to past.
15	Fortune Hong Kong Trading v Neptra Shipping: Bill of Lading Dispute & Cargo Release 14 Aug 2001 Neptra Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	14 Aug 2001	Neptra Shipping Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant; the Defendant is entitled to indemnity from the Third Party. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Bajumi Wahab v Afro-Asia Shipping: Valuation Dispute over Company Assets 08 May 2001 Sjaiful Bachri Bajumi (Plaintiff)Neutral	08 May 2001	Sjaiful Bachri Bajumi (Plaintiff): Fair value of assets determinedCourt determined the fair value of the Ssangyong shares, Afro-Asia Building, and the rubber plantation.
17	Hung Vuong-2: Choice of Jurisdiction & Bill of Lading Dispute 10 May 2000 Respondents (Respondent)Won	10 May 2000	Respondents (Respondent): Stay Application UpheldThe respondents successfully defended against the appeal to stay the proceedings.