Harish Kumar

Harish Kumar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 33 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and winding up. Their track record shows a 34.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 15 complex cases, representing 45% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Harish Kumar has demonstrated expertise across 116 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	23 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 23 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Company Law	14 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	10 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	9 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	9 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice41% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Purchase Agreement	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Quantum meruit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking out	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recusal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common intention constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Letters of Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tenancy in Common	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Subscription Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Warranty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conditions Precedent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Amendment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Share Sale Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitutionary Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale in lieu of partition	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Margin Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Indemnification	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Encumbrances	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Good and Marketable Title	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Futures Brokerage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rectification of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Relief Against Forfeiture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholders Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Illegitimate pressure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Foreclosure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Directors' Remuneration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Law Corporations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agreement to Lease	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Financing Arrangement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Account of Share of Profits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual discretions	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disclosure Obligations	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duress	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Accounting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harish Kumar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Harish Kumar has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Engelin Teh Practice LLC	10 cases	30% of cases	Metro Alliance v WestLB: Forfeiture of Deposit & Contractual Conditions in Sub-Participation Interest Purchase(Oct 2007) Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Titles Act(Nov 2006) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Recusal Application Based on Alleged Bias in Prior Proceedings(Jan 2006)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	9 cases	27% of cases	Shipworks v Sembcorp Marine: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Shipyard Services(Dec 2024) Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability(Mar 2023) Commodities Intelligence Centre Pte Ltd v Mako International Trd Pte Ltd: Agency, Fiduciary Duties & Contractual Disputes(May 2022)
Rajah & Tann LLP	9 cases	27% of cases	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Hong Hin Kit: Sale Share Dispute & Liability Claims(Apr 2014) Columbia Asia Healthcare v Hong Hin Kit: Share Purchase Agreement & Breach of Warranties(Apr 2014) Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets: Margin Trading, Wrongful Close-Out of Futures Contracts(Dec 2013)
Engelin Teh & Partners	3 cases	9% of cases	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Breach of Contract & Proof of Debt in Liquidation(Jul 2001) Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Appeal Timing & Further Arguments(Jun 2001) Friis v Casetech: Breach of Contract & Account of Profits Dispute(Jul 2000)
Rajah and Tann LLP	1 cases	3% of cases	Hong Hin Kit Edward v PT Nusautama: Abuse of Process, Conspiracy, and Rectification of Share Sale Agreement(Jul 2010)
Chor Pee & Partners	1 cases	3% of cases	IHC Pte Ltd v Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy: Contract Formation & Constructive Trust Dispute over Scotts Holdings Shares(Feb 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Harish Kumar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 15 (45%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	24.0 parties avg	4.0	6%
Lost	94.3 parties avg	4.3	27%
Neutral	22.0 parties avg	2.0	6%
Partial	104.5 parties avg	4.5	30%
Won	123.4 parties avg	3.4	36%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	52.4 parties avg	2.4
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	43.2 parties avg	3.2
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2015	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	33.5 parties avg	3.5
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Harish Kumar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(6%)	6%
Lost	9(26%)	26%
Neutral	2(6%)	6%
Partial	10(29%)	29%
Won	12(34%)	34%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	35,700.00	3,570.0010 cases	10
USD	7,223,493.02	3,611,746.512 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	5 1211	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	3 12	Dismissed: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 33 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shipworks v Sembcorp Marine: Breach of Contract & Illegality in Shipyard Services 19 Dec 2024 Lanka Marine Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim)Partial	19 Dec 2024	Lanka Marine Services Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant-in-Counterclaim): Claim Partially AllowedClaim for unpaid invoices partially allowed; quantum to be determined jointly by parties. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability 30 Mar 2023 Zhang Shengqiang (Defendant)Won	30 Mar 2023	Zhang Shengqiang (Defendant): WonSam is to pay Zhang his costs in respect of S 345, fixed at S$30,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	Commodities Intelligence Centre Pte Ltd v Mako International Trd Pte Ltd: Agency, Fiduciary Duties & Contractual Disputes 30 May 2022 Commodities Intelligence Centre Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Lost	30 May 2022	Commodities Intelligence Centre Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Claim DismissedAll causes of action are dismissed.
4	Saxo Bank A/S v Innopac Holdings Ltd: Striking Out Defence for Failure to Comply with Discovery Obligations 19 Sep 2021 Saxo Bank A/S (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	19 Sep 2021	Saxo Bank A/S (Plaintiff, Respondent): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
5	Tong Seak Kan v Jaya Sudhir: Contract Dispute over Liquefied Natural Gas Project 15 Aug 2019 Kensington Park Holdings Limited (Plaintiff)Won	15 Aug 2019	Kensington Park Holdings Limited (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $3,250,000 (assumed USD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tong Seak Kan v Jaya Sudhir: Striking Out Pleadings for Irrelevance 26 Sep 2016 Jaya Sudhir a/l Jayaram (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	26 Sep 2016	Jaya Sudhir a/l Jayaram (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedDefendant's appeal was dismissed, and the defendant was ordered to pay costs of $4,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Edward Hong: Assessment of Damages for MEC Charge Removal 08 Sep 2016 PT Nusautama Medicalindo (Plaintiff)Partial	08 Sep 2016	PT Nusautama Medicalindo (Plaintiff): PartialDamages awarded for Kusnandar's fees in the amount of $46,746.51 (assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts).
8	Su Emmanuel v Emmanuel Priya: Equitable Accounting & Tenancy in Common Dispute 18 May 2016 Su Emmanuel (Appellant)Partial	18 May 2016	Su Emmanuel (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe order for the sale of the property was upheld, but the declaration that the sister was entitled to 70% of the property was set aside. Su Emmanuel is required to reimburse Emmanuel Priya Ethel Anne $74,586.77 for mortgage payments made on Su's behalf.
9	Columbia Asia v Hong: Share Purchase Agreement Dispute over Hospital Acquisition 21 Jan 2015 Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	21 Jan 2015	Columbia Asia Healthcare Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part, Appeal allowed in partAppeal in CA 68 dismissed; appeal in CA 69 allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Hong Hin Kit: Sale Share Dispute & Liability Claims 21 Apr 2014 Albert Hong Hin Kay (Defendant)Dismissed	21 Apr 2014	Albert Hong Hin Kay (Defendant): Prayers for relief dismissedThe Hongs’ prayers for relief in their counterclaim in Suit 964 were dismissed.
11	Columbia Asia Healthcare v Hong Hin Kit: Share Purchase Agreement & Breach of Warranties 09 Apr 2014 PT Nusautama Medicalindo (Plaintiff, Defendant)Partial	09 Apr 2014	PT Nusautama Medicalindo (Plaintiff, Defendant): Partial Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for damages to be assessed for the reasonable costs of taking measures to remove the MEC Charge from the land title certificate. The assessment of such costs is to be conducted by me or another judge (including a judicial commissioner) of the High Court. The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any claim by DVI in relation to the transfer of the DVI Shares, including reasonable costs of defending any claim that DVI may bring against Columbia and/or PTNM. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of IDR 7,027,522,992 being the additional taxes that were paid to the ITA in respect of the years 2004 to 2007; and The Hongs are liable to indemnify Columbia for any future tax assessments on PTNM for the period before 22 January 2008, as well as any penalties which may be imposed and/or any reasonable costs (including legal costs) which may be incurred in dealing with any investigation and/or prosecution by the tax authorities. The Hongs to indemnify Columbia for the sum of S$262,934.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Tan Chin Yew Joseph v Saxo Capital Markets: Margin Trading, Wrongful Close-Out of Futures Contracts 17 Dec 2013 Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Dec 2013	Saxo Capital Markets Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
13	Woodcliff Assets v Reflexology: Minority Oppression & Winding Up Dispute 24 Oct 2010 Reflexology and Holistic Health Academy Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	24 Oct 2010	Reflexology and Holistic Health Academy Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application to strike out dismissedThe Defendant's application to strike out the Plaintiff's statement of claim was dismissed.
14	Hong Hin Kit Edward v PT Nusautama: Abuse of Process, Conspiracy, and Rectification of Share Sale Agreement 05 Jul 2010 Columbia Asia (Defendant)Won	05 Jul 2010	Columbia Asia (Defendant): Appeal allowedAppeal in RA 142 of 2010 was allowed.
15	Focus Energy Ltd v Aye Aye Soe: Garnishee Order and Exchange Control Act 08 Feb 2010 Focus Energy Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	08 Feb 2010	Focus Energy Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal WonAppeals dismissed; costs of $600 for each appeal awarded to Focus Energy Ltd (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Indulge Food Pte Ltd v Torabi Marashi Bahram: Breach of Contract & Recovery of Sums Paid 18 Jan 2010 Torabi Marashi Bahram (Defendant)Lost	18 Jan 2010	Torabi Marashi Bahram (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedTorabi Marashi Bahram's counterclaim against Indulge Food Pte Ltd was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Woodcliff Assets v Reflexology and Holistic Health Academy: Production of Documents in Winding-Up 09 Jul 2009 Michael Wong CK (Defendant)Partial	09 Jul 2009	Michael Wong CK (Defendant): Order for production of documents granted in partOrder in terms granted of prayer 1(a)–(c) and (e).
18	Tam Tak Chuen v Khairul: Duress, Illegitimate Pressure & Contract Rescission 29 Dec 2008 Eden Medical Aesthetics Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Dec 2008	Eden Medical Aesthetics Pte Ltd (Defendant): Documents set asideThe documents executed by the plaintiff on 4 March 2007 were set aside.
19	Focus Energy Ltd v Aye Aye Soe: Forum Non Conveniens & Breach of Fiduciary Duty 11 Nov 2008 Focus Energy Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	11 Nov 2008	Focus Energy Ltd (Plaintiff): Application for Stay DismissedThe plaintiff successfully opposed the defendant's application for a stay of proceedings.
20	Metro Alliance v WestLB: Forfeiture of Deposit & Contractual Conditions in Sub-Participation Interest Purchase 14 Oct 2007 WestLB AG (Defendant, Respondent)Won	14 Oct 2007	WestLB AG (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; deposit forfeited.
21	Hong Leong Singapore Finance Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Proprietary Estoppel & Land Titles Act 22 Nov 2006 Yongnam Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	22 Nov 2006	Yongnam Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial WinPartial win; entitled to relief based on proprietary estoppel.
22	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Recusal Application Based on Alleged Bias in Prior Proceedings 31 Jan 2006 UBS AG (Defendant, Respondent)Won	31 Jan 2006	UBS AG (Defendant, Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for the judge to recuse himself was dismissed.
23	Sumikin Bussan Corp v Hiew Teck Seng: Summary Judgment & Extension of Time for Filing Reply 19 Apr 2005 Sumikin Bussan Corp (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	19 Apr 2005	Sumikin Bussan Corp (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, setting aside the order made below.
24	Intergraph v Zhang: Employee Insurance Benefits & Trust Law 09 Nov 2004 Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	09 Nov 2004	Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, except for the insurance money received under the Hospital Policy. Intergraph was entitled to the insurance money from the Life Policy and the Accident Policy. No order was made on Intergraph’s counterclaim. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
25	Jumabhoy Rafiq v Scotts Investments: Director's Remuneration & Indemnification Dispute 05 Oct 2004 Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	05 Oct 2004	Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent successfully defended the appeal, and was awarded costs.
26	Zhang Yiguang v Intergraph Systems: Employee Insurance Benefits & Employer Deductions Dispute 10 Jun 2004 Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Jun 2004	Intergraph Systems South East Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedDefendant's counterclaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	Scotts Investments v Jumabhoy: Director's Remuneration & Interpretation of 'Costs and Expenses' 04 Feb 2004 Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Plaintiff)Dismissed	04 Feb 2004	Scotts Investments (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in compulsory liquidation) (Plaintiff): Claim DiscontinuedThe liquidators’ claim had been discontinued.
28	Engelin Teh Practice LLC v Wee Soon Kim Anthony: Enforceability of Costs Agreement After Law Firm Dissolution 11 Jan 2004 Engelin Teh Practice LLC (Applicant)Lost	11 Jan 2004	Engelin Teh Practice LLC (Applicant): Summons dismissedThe court dismissed the summons because ETP was not a party to the original costs agreement.
29	Ng Heng Liat v Kiyue Co Ltd: Directors' Fiduciary Duties & Minority Shareholder Rights 21 Mar 2003 Lau Kim Yang (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	21 Mar 2003	Lau Kim Yang (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal against the dismissal of the application to strike out the counterclaim was allowed.
30	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Breach of Contract & Proof of Debt in Liquidation 05 Jul 2001 Thomson Plaza (Pte) Ltd (Applicant)Lost	05 Jul 2001	Thomson Plaza (Pte) Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedThomson Plaza's application to recover damages for breach of contract was dismissed.
31	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Appeal Timing & Further Arguments 20 Jun 2001 Thomson Plaza (Pte) Ltd (Appellant)Neutral	20 Jun 2001	Thomson Plaza (Pte) Ltd (Appellant): Motion dismissedMotion to strike out notice of appeal was dismissed.
32	Friis v Casetech: Breach of Contract & Account of Profits Dispute 13 Jul 2000 Combined Overseas Transport Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	13 Jul 2000	Combined Overseas Transport Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part. The court set aside the order made below for a taking of accounts, and in lieu thereof, order an account to be taken of the profits made from the use of the overdraft facilities for the back-to-back trades or transactions which the parties had agreed, but such taking of account be limited to the back-to-back transactions occurring after the 7 July 1992. We also award interest on the amount found due on the taking of such account at the same rate as that awarded below, such interest to run from the date of the writ. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
33	IHC Pte Ltd v Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy: Contract Formation & Constructive Trust Dispute over Scotts Holdings Shares 27 Feb 2000 Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy (Respondent)Lost	27 Feb 2000	Mustafa Ali Jumabhoy (Respondent): Claim DismissedThe respondent's claim for the return of shares was dismissed.