Harold Seet

Harold Seet is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and contract law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Harold Seet has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Harold Seet has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Harold Seet has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harold Seet & Indra Raj	4 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Ng Guan Hup: Withdrawal of Charge and Discharge Application(Jul 2009) Trigen Industries v Sinko Technologies: Breach of Contract & Agency in Computer Chip Sale(Oct 2002) Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Negligence, Causation, and Appellate Review of Factual Findings(Aug 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Harold Seet's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Harold Seet's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	149,760.00	149,760.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Ng Guan Hup: Withdrawal of Charge and Discharge Application 23 Jul 2009 Ng Guan Hup (Respondent)Lost	23 Jul 2009	Ng Guan Hup (Respondent): Discharge not amounting to an acquittalThe respondent was discharged from and of the three charges concerned, but the discharge did not amount to an acquittal.
2	Trigen Industries v Sinko Technologies: Breach of Contract & Agency in Computer Chip Sale 28 Oct 2002 Trigen Industries Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Oct 2002	Trigen Industries Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of US$134,400 and a further sum of US$15,360, with interest and costs. Assumed USD as the transactions were in USD.
3	Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Negligence, Causation, and Appellate Review of Factual Findings 27 Aug 2001 Chew Ah Kiat (Appellant)Lost	27 Aug 2001	Chew Ah Kiat (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
4	Chew Ah Kiat v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Law, Singapore High Court 27 Aug 2001 Chew Ah Kiat (Appellant)Neutral	27 Aug 2001	Chew Ah Kiat (Appellant): No outcome information provided in the text.No outcome information provided in the text.