Harsharan Kaur

Harsharan Kaur is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Architectural Services	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Labuan Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contra Proferentem Rule	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fundamental Change of Circumstances	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harsharan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Harsharan Kaur has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	5 cases	100% of cases	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages(Jan 2019) BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project(Jul 2017) Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet: Discovery Dispute over Labuan Companies Act(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Harsharan Kaur's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.8 parties avg	3.8	80%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Harsharan Kaur's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(80%)	80%
Won	1(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan Resources: Breach of Contract & Damages 08 Jan 2019 Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Jan 2019	Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant): LostThe court found that BCBCS had the financial ability to fund KSC until the completion of commissioning and testing at the Tabang Plant or until June 2012.
2	BCBC Singapore v PT Bayan: Breach of Contract & Remedies in Joint Venture Coal Briquetting Project 24 Jul 2017 Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	24 Jul 2017	Bayan International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Repudiated Joint Venture DeedThe court found that the Defendant repudiated the Joint Venture Deed. The monetary amount is set to 0.00 as the quantum of damages will be determined in Tranche 3. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ram Parshotam Mittal v Portcullis Trustnet: Discovery Dispute over Labuan Companies Act 26 Apr 2015 Chairman of the Portcullis Group (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2015	Chairman of the Portcullis Group (Defendant): Order to produce documentsDefendants were ordered to produce the requested documents for inspection by the Plaintiff.
4	Ong & Ong v Fairview Developments: Offer to Settle & Contract Law 22 Jan 2015 Fairview Developments Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	22 Jan 2015	Fairview Developments Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the court found that there was a valid acceptance of the offer to settle and the offer as accepted is enforceable. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Motor Image Enterprises v SCDA Architects: Appeal on Domestic Arbitration Award Interpretation 02 Nov 2011 Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Nov 2011	Motor Image Enterprises Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.