Harvindarjit Singh Bath

Harvindarjit Singh Bath is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and work injury compensation. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil litigation and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bribes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Harvindarjit Singh Bath has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Harvindarjit Singh Bath has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Surian & Partners	2 cases	67% of cases	Leong Wai Kay v Carrefour Singapore: Recovery of Bribes Under Prevention of Corruption Act(Apr 2007) Public Prosecutor v Sudarsanan Margasagayam: Rape Charges & Witness Credibility(Sep 2006)
Hoh Law Corporation	1 cases	33% of cases	Yang Dan v Xian De Lai: Work Injury Compensation & General Law Claim(Nov 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Harvindarjit Singh Bath's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Harvindarjit Singh Bath's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yang Dan v Xian De Lai: Work Injury Compensation & General Law Claim 24 Nov 2010 Yang Dan (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2010	Yang Dan (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe plaintiff's appeal was dismissed, meaning he cannot pursue a general law claim after an order was made on his compensation claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Leong Wai Kay v Carrefour Singapore: Recovery of Bribes Under Prevention of Corruption Act 29 Apr 2007 Leong Wai Kay (Appellant)Lost	29 Apr 2007	Leong Wai Kay (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the judgment in favor of Carrefour Singapore Pte Ltd was dismissed.
3	Public Prosecutor v Sudarsanan Margasagayam: Rape Charges & Witness Credibility 24 Sep 2006 Sudarsanan Margasagayam (Accused)Won	24 Sep 2006	Sudarsanan Margasagayam (Accused): Accused discharged and acquittedThe accused was found not guilty due to reasonable doubt.