Hay Hung Chun

Hay Hung Chun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 56 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 64.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated expertise across 100 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	51 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 51 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	40 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 40 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	27 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 27 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	15 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 15 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	15 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 15 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	12 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	10 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	9 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Diminished Responsibility	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	5 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Psychiatry	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ad Hoc Admission	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Provocation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntarily Causing Hurt	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Immigration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sudden fight	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Match-fixing	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bail	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Filing documents out of time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Rage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attempt to Murder	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Small Claims Tribunal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affray	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Controlled Drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Common Gaming Houses Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Immigration Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Mercy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rule of Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Primary School Admission	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Precedents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Review of Detention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Re-sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Crime of Passion	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loansharking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Transport Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Order Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Films Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Import of illegal items	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Kleptomania	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Miscellaneous Offences (Public Order and Nuisance) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Self Defence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Juvenile Delinquency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Casinos and Gambling	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Rights	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Work Permits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adverse inferences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Youthful Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Vexatious litigants	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hay Hung Chun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hay Hung Chun has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 34 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	34 cases	61% of cases	Kassimatis & Fitzgerald v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission for Constitutional Challenge to Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2024) Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel & Legal Profession Act Interpretation(Sep 2024) Tan Sen Yang v. Public Prosecutor: Murder, Sudden Fight, and Diminished Responsibility at Orchard Towers(Aug 2024)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	16 cases	29% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kwee Siong: Drug Trafficking & Knowledge of Controlled Drugs(Jul 2008) You Xin v PP: Contempt of Court & Unpermitted Assembly - Falun Gong Practitioners' Appeal(Jul 2007) Ng Chye Huey v PP: Court of Appeal's Jurisdiction on Criminal Motion & Abuse of Process(Jan 2007)
Deputy Public Prosecutors	3 cases	5% of cases	Ng Chye Huay v PP: Freedom of Assembly & Expression vs. Public Order(Oct 2005) S Selvamsylvester v Public Prosecutor: Bail Application for Non-Bailable Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment(Aug 2005) Suboh bin Ramli v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act(Nov 2000)
Independent Practitioner	2 cases	4% of cases	Low Song Chye v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Sentencing Appeal(Jun 2019) Phua Kong Yang v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Assembly, Voluntarily Causing Hurt(Dec 2009)
Attorney–General’s Chambers	1 cases	2% of cases	Ahmed Salim v Public Prosecutor: Diminished Responsibility & Premeditated Murder(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hay Hung Chun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 7 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	92.2 parties avg	2.2	16%
Partial	112.4 parties avg	2.4	20%
Won	362.8 parties avg	2.8	64%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2001	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	42.3 parties avg	2.3
2006	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2008	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	46.5 parties avg	6.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hay Hung Chun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	9(16%)	16%
Partial	11(20%)	20%
Won	36(64%)	64%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	9,500.00	863.6411 cases	11

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2001	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2006	5 113	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2007	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	3 21	Partial: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2014	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	5 113	Lost: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 3 cases (60.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2022	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 56 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kassimatis & Fitzgerald v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission for Constitutional Challenge to Misuse of Drugs Act 07 Nov 2024 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent)Won	07 Nov 2024	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeals by Theodoros Kassimatis KC and Edward Fitzgerald KC dismissed.
2	Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission of Foreign Counsel & Legal Profession Act Interpretation 24 Sep 2024 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent)Won	24 Sep 2024	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal against the Preliminary Objection dismissedAppeal against the Preliminary Objection dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.
3	Tan Sen Yang v. Public Prosecutor: Murder, Sudden Fight, and Diminished Responsibility at Orchard Towers 07 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	07 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused convicted of murder under section 300(c) of the Penal Code.
4	Kassimatis KC v Attorney-General: Ad Hoc Admission & Legal Profession Act 29 Jan 2024 Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent)Won	29 Jan 2024	Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentApplications for ad hoc admission were dismissed.
5	Jumaat bin Mohamed Sayed v Attorney-General: Extension of Time for Appeal & Constitutionality of MDA Presumptions 24 May 2023 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	24 May 2023	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for reinstatement of appeal and extension of time to file documents was dismissed.
6	Oliver Lim Yue Xuan v Public Prosecutor: Appeal for Second Chance at Probation for Young Offender 11 May 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 May 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against sentence was allowed, and the original sentence was substituted with a Probation Order.
7	Roszaidi v PP: Diminished Responsibility, MDD, SUD & Drug Trafficking Sentence 30 Nov 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	30 Nov 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; death penalty set aside and re-sentenced to imprisonment for life.
8	Jumaat v Attorney-General: Constitutional Rights, Presumption of Innocence & Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Nov 2022 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	24 Nov 2022	Attorney-General (Defendant): Application dismissedThe application by the Claimants was dismissed.
9	Ahmed Salim v Public Prosecutor: Diminished Responsibility & Premeditated Murder 18 Jan 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jan 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, upholding the conviction and sentence.
10	Public Prosecutor v Shoo Ah San: Attempted Murder Sentencing for Stabbing Daughter 04 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	04 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 15 years’ imprisonment.
11	Public Prosecutor v. Ahmed Salim: Murder, Provocation, and Diminished Responsibility in Golden Dragon Hotel Killing 21 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was convicted of murder.
12	Public Prosecutor v Roszaidi bin Osman: Misuse of Drugs Act & Diminished Responsibility 31 Jan 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Lost	31 Jan 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Defendant does not qualify for alternative sentencingThe court found that Roszaidi does not satisfy the requirements under s 33B(3)(b) of the MDA and, consequently, cannot avail himself of the alternative sentencing regime under s 33B(1)(b) of the MDA.
13	Mohammad Azli v PP: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Abetment 22 Apr 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was partially dismissed as Azli's appeal was allowed.
14	PP v Abdul Qayyum: Sentencing of Young Offender for Unlawful Assembly with Community-Based Orders 18 Mar 2020 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	18 Mar 2020	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the original sentence was dismissed.
15	Ng Soon Kim v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt by Fire & Sentencing Appeal 16 Oct 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	16 Oct 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe appeal was partially successful in reducing the sentence and disqualification period.
16	Low Song Chye v Public Prosecutor: Voluntarily Causing Hurt & Sentencing Appeal 05 Jun 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant)Won	05 Jun 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedProsecution's appeal against sentence was allowed, enhancing the sentence imposed to four months’ imprisonment.
17	Public Prosecutor v. Adili Chibuike Ejike: Illegally Importing Methamphetamine 10 May 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	10 May 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty on the charge he faced.
18	PP v Mohd Taib bin Ahmad: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jun 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Jun 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionAccused was convicted of drug trafficking.
19	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention Order & Limits of Executive Power under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act 24 Nov 2015 Attorney-General (Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2015	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the conclusion we have reached makes it unnecessary for us to deal with two other grounds of challenge raised by the Appellant, namely, irrationality and procedural irregularity. It follows that the Appellant should be freed and the costs order made against him below should be set aside. We will hear the parties on any other issues that remain outstanding, including the question of costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Wong Yi Hao Henry v Public Prosecutor: False Information for Primary School Admission 27 Aug 2015 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Aug 2015	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially LostThe Public Prosecutor initially sought a custodial sentence, but later did not oppose the appeal for a fine (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Public Prosecutor v Qiu Shuihua: Sexual Penetration of a Minor & Sentencing Principles 14 Apr 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	14 Apr 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was allowed, and the sentence for the penile-vaginal penetration charge was enhanced.
22	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act for Match-Fixing 21 Jan 2015 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	21 Jan 2015	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Attorney-General successfully opposed the application for an Order for Review of Detention. The Applicant was ordered to pay the Attorney-General costs of $8,500, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
23	PP v Kho Jabing: Discretionary Death Penalty, Murder, Blatant Disregard for Human Life 13 Jan 2015 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	13 Jan 2015	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the death penalty was imposed on the Respondent.
24	PP v Wang Zhijian: Murder Conviction Upheld; Diminished Responsibility Defense Fails 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal against the acquittal of the Accused on the 1st and 2nd Charges of the murder offences was allowed.
25	PP v Kamrul Hasan: Re-Sentencing for Murder under Penal Code s 300(c) 07 Jan 2014 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	07 Jan 2014	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe prosecution sought a sentence of life imprisonment with 16-18 strokes of the cane. The court imposed life imprisonment with 10 strokes of the cane (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	PP v Wang Zhijian: Diminished Responsibility, Murder, and Adjustment Disorder 29 Nov 2012 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	29 Nov 2012	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialThe Public Prosecutor partially won the case, securing a murder conviction on one charge but failing to secure murder convictions on two other charges due to the defense of diminished responsibility.
27	Mas Swan v Public Prosecutor: Attempted Drug Importation & Inconsistent Defenses 13 May 2012 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	13 May 2012	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Mas Swan convicted of attempted importation of ecstasy; Roshamima's conviction for importing diamorphine set aside; convicted of attempted importation of ecstasy.
28	Public Prosecutor v Ali bin Bakar: Appeal Against Theft in Dwelling Sentence 16 Apr 2012 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	16 Apr 2012	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal allowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeal against the sentences was allowed, and the sentences were increased.
29	Public Prosecutor v Nelson Jeyaraj: Enhanced Sentence for Harassment by Fire under Moneylenders Act 15 Feb 2011 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	15 Feb 2011	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the sentence was allowed.
30	Balbir Singh v PP: Assault on Public Transport Worker & Sentencing Principles 21 Apr 2010 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	21 Apr 2010	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial WinThe Public Prosecutor was the respondent in both appeals. They won the appeal against Balbir Singh but lost the appeal against Taniguchi Mitsuru.
31	PP v Kester Ng: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 21 Jan 2010 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	21 Jan 2010	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of drug trafficking.
32	Phua Kong Yang v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Assembly, Voluntarily Causing Hurt 07 Dec 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	07 Dec 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Original sentence reduced on appealThe High Court reduced the original sentence of 3 months' imprisonment to 1 month.
33	Yuen Wai Loon v Public Prosecutor: Statutory Interpretation of Private Investigation and Security Agencies Act 09 Jul 2009 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	09 Jul 2009	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the Public Prosecutor's arguments were not accepted.
34	Public Prosecutor v Ng Yong Leng: Engaging in Business of Conveying Prohibited Immigrants 02 Jul 2009 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Jul 2009	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence upheldThe High Court upheld the sentence imposed by the lower court.
35	Public Prosecutor v Lee Kwee Siong: Drug Trafficking & Knowledge of Controlled Drugs 20 Jul 2008 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Jul 2008	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionThe Public Prosecutor won the case, leading to the conviction of both accused.
36	Attorney-General v Tee Kok Boon: Vexatious Litigant Restraint Order 27 Dec 2007 Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	27 Dec 2007	Attorney-General (Applicant): Application GrantedThe Attorney-General's application for a restraining order against Tee Kok Boon was granted.
37	You Xin v PP: Contempt of Court & Unpermitted Assembly - Falun Gong Practitioners' Appeal 23 Jul 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Jul 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment upheldThe convictions of the Appellants were upheld.
38	Ng Chye Huey v PP: Court of Appeal's Jurisdiction on Criminal Motion & Abuse of Process 23 Jan 2007 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Jan 2007	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication dismissed as misconceived.
39	Lim Li Ling v PP: Sentencing for Assisting in Public Lottery under Common Gaming Houses Act 18 Oct 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Oct 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial lossThe appeal was allowed in part, with the fine reduced from $200,000 to $80,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
40	Tee Kok Boon v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision of District Court Decision 31 Aug 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	31 Aug 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for criminal revision was dismissed.
41	Chng Yew Chin v PP: Outrage of Modesty & Judicial Mercy for Terminally Ill Offenders 07 Aug 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Aug 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal against conviction upheldAppeal against conviction upheld.
42	Lim Hong Kheng v Public Prosecutor: Extension of Time for Appeal, Criminal Procedure 06 Jun 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	06 Jun 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DeniedThe respondent's objection to the motion was overruled.
43	Tee Kok Boon v Public Prosecutor: Extension of Time to Appeal Criminal Conviction 10 Apr 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Apr 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for extension of time to apply for leave to refer questions of law to the Court of Appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
44	Goh Lee Yin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Theft Sentence for Kleptomania 08 Dec 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	08 Dec 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor's opposition to probation was overruled, and the appeal was allowed.
45	Ng Chye Huay v PP: Freedom of Assembly & Expression vs. Public Order 16 Oct 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Oct 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeals of both appellants against conviction and sentence were dismissed.
46	Tee Chu Feng v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Conviction Appeal 03 Oct 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Oct 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the drug trafficking conviction.
47	S Selvamsylvester v Public Prosecutor: Bail Application for Non-Bailable Offences Punishable with Life Imprisonment 30 Aug 2005 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	30 Aug 2005	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application deniedBail application denied.
48	PP v Tan Chee Wee: Murder, Self-Defense & Sudden Fight in Robbery 01 Oct 2003 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	01 Oct 2003	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of murder (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
49	Soong Hee Sin v Public Prosecutor: Appeal on Sentence for Criminal Breach of Trust 18 Mar 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	18 Mar 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe appeal was partially successful as the sentence was reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
50	Ng Kim Han v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Revision for Gaming Offence Conviction 07 Mar 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	07 Mar 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedPetition allowed; conviction reversed and fine of $1,000 to be returned (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
51	Elizabeth Usha v PP: Harbouring Illegal Immigrants Without Proprietary Interest in Premises 21 Feb 2001 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	21 Feb 2001	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for harbouring illegal immigrants.
52	Cheng Thomas v PP: Appeal Against Reformative Training for Unruly Behavior at Boys' Home 29 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence of reformative training.
53	Suboh bin Ramli v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking in Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 15 Nov 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	15 Nov 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Suboh's conviction.
54	Choy Tuck Sum v Public Prosecutor: Abetting Employment of Foreign Worker Without Valid Work Permit & Enhanced Punishment 30 Oct 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	30 Oct 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal was dismissed, and the original sentence was upheld.
55	PP v Abdul Salam: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act, Common Intention 06 Sep 2000 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	06 Sep 2000	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial SuccessConviction of the second and third accused, but acquittal of the first accused.
56	Syed Yasser Arafat v PP: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Presumption of Possession 23 Aug 2000 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	23 Aug 2000	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; conviction and sentence upheld.