Heershan Kaur

Heershan Kaur is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Heershan Kaur has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	6 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized97% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Defence of necessity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Heershan Kaur has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Heershan Kaur has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	100% of cases	Shen Hanjie v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Presumption of Knowledge(Feb 2024) Muhammad Hamir B Laka v Public Prosecutor: Defence of Necessity & Misuse of Drugs Act(Jul 2023) Public Prosecutor v Affandi bin Mohamed Hassan: Trafficking of Diamorphine(Jun 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Heershan Kaur's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	62.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Heershan Kaur's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	6(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Shen Hanjie v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Presumption of Knowledge 29 Feb 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Feb 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence.
2	Muhammad Hamir B Laka v Public Prosecutor: Defence of Necessity & Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jul 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 Jul 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence for drug trafficking.
3	Public Prosecutor v Affandi bin Mohamed Hassan: Trafficking of Diamorphine 29 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	29 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused was found guilty as charged and convicted accordingly.
4	Public Prosecutor v Shen Hanjie: Sentencing for Diamorphine Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Oct 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Oct 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.Accused sentenced to the mandatory death penalty.
5	PP v Shen Hanjie: Trafficking Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act, Possession for Trafficking 08 May 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	08 May 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of drug trafficking offence.
6	Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeals by Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar and Nazeeha binte Abu Hasan were dismissed.