Hendroff Fitzgerald L

Hendroff Fitzgerald L is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insurance and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Recourse against award	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Business interruption policies	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hendroff Fitzgerald L has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hendroff Fitzgerald L has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	QBE Insurance v Relax Beach: COVID-19, Business Interruption, & Insurance Claim Notification(Dec 2023) UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale(Oct 2022) Year Sun v Gunvor: Setting Aside SIAC Award for Gasoil Contract Breach(Oct 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hendroff Fitzgerald L's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	22.5 parties avg	2.5	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hendroff Fitzgerald L's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	108,629.30	36,209.773 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	QBE Insurance v Relax Beach: COVID-19, Business Interruption, & Insurance Claim Notification 20 Dec 2023 Relax Beach Co Ltd (Respondent)Won	20 Dec 2023	Relax Beach Co Ltd (Respondent): Costs AwardedRespondent awarded costs of S$40,000 for CA 3 and OA 18, and disbursements amounting to S$4,629.30. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	UOB v Lippo Marina: Unlawful Means Conspiracy & Deceit in Property Sale 27 Oct 2022 Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	27 Oct 2022	Lippo Marina Collection Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; Lippo is liable to pay damages to UOB, the quantum of which will be determined at the assessment of damages. UOB awarded 70% of the costs of the appeal which we assess to be $70,000. 70% of that is $49,000. This does not include disbursements of the appeal for which UOB claims $45,256.04 because of voluminous documents. However, a substantial part of the documents was not necessary for CA 67 as they were repeat documents which were common to the purchasers. UOB should have sought directions whether they could have used sample documents instead. In the circumstances, this court awards UOB $10,000 for disbursements of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Year Sun v Gunvor: Setting Aside SIAC Award for Gasoil Contract Breach 12 Oct 2021 Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	12 Oct 2021	Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe application to set aside the arbitration award was dismissed, and costs of S$15,000 were awarded to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).