Heng Chye Ming Friedrich

Heng Chye Ming Friedrich is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in family law and matrimonial assets. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and matrimonial assets.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Will Interpretation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Writ of Seizure and Sale	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Professional communications	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Heng Chye Ming Friedrich has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Oei & Oei LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Xia Zheng v Song Jianbo: Effect of Divorce Judgment on Joint Tenancy & Writ of Seizure(May 2022) CLB v CLC: Child Custody, Care & Control, Access, and Maintenance Dispute Post-Divorce(Jan 2022) WHR v WHT: Discovery of Documents and Interrogatories in Probate Action(Oct 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Heng Chye Ming Friedrich's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	116.0 parties avg	16.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	116.0 parties avg	16.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Heng Chye Ming Friedrich's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Xia Zheng v Song Jianbo: Effect of Divorce Judgment on Joint Tenancy & Writ of Seizure 25 May 2022 Xia Zheng (Plaintiff)Won	25 May 2022	Xia Zheng (Plaintiff): Declaration granted; writ of seizure and sale set asideDeclaration that Ms. Xia is the beneficial owner of the Orchard Property granted. Writ of seizure and sale set aside. Costs ordered against Mr. Song. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	CLB v CLC: Child Custody, Care & Control, Access, and Maintenance Dispute Post-Divorce 20 Jan 2022 CLB (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Jan 2022	CLB (Plaintiff): Access orders grantedThe Father was granted access to the children, including weekly day access, overnight access commencing after six months, and specific arrangements for school holidays, Chinese New Year, special days, and overseas access.
3	WHR v WHT: Discovery of Documents and Interrogatories in Probate Action 01 Oct 2020 WHV (Defendant)Neutral	01 Oct 2020	WHV (Defendant): NeutralDefendant took a neutral position. No monetary amount was specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.