Heng Gwee Nam Henry

Heng Gwee Nam Henry is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in admiralty and maritime law and injunctions. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in admiralty and maritime law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Action in rem	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Writ in rem	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Heng Gwee Nam Henry has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Heng Gwee Nam Henry has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legal Solutions LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Chen Mingxing v Zhang Jian: Interim Injunction for OEL Shares Dispute(Jan 2021) Han Kook Capital v Winplus: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Action in Rem & Striking Out(Jan 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Heng Gwee Nam Henry's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.3
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Partial	111.0 parties avg	11.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2021	111.0 parties avg	11.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Heng Gwee Nam Henry's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	25,000.00	25,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chen Mingxing v Zhang Jian: Interim Injunction for OEL Shares Dispute 04 Jan 2021 Eminence Investment Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	04 Jan 2021	Eminence Investment Pte Ltd (Defendant): Interim injunction granted in partInterim injunction granted with a limitation as to its scope to 197,545,000 of the ordinary shares in OEL which were purchased from Mr Hing on or around 16 December 2019.
2	Han Kook Capital v Winplus: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Action in Rem & Striking Out 19 Jan 2016 Han Kook Capital Co, Ltd (Applicant, Appellant)Lost	19 Jan 2016	Han Kook Capital Co, Ltd (Applicant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $25,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid to each of the respondents in CA 59/2015 and CA 62/2015. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.