Hing Shan Shan Blossom

Hing Shan Shan Blossom is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in insolvency law and winding up. Their track record shows a 81.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated expertise across 89 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	8 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice22% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Presumption of Advancement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forum conveniens	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cryptoassets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common Intention Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Auditing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lock-up Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joinder Applications	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative Arbitral Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidator's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Pledge	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drag-along Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hing Shan Shan Blossom has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hing Shan Shan Blossom has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	16 cases	100% of cases	Victory International v Borrelli: Receiver's Duties & Legal Profession Act Assessment(Jan 2025) DJY v DJZ: Injunction to Restrain Performance Bond Call \| Construction Dispute(Nov 2024) Three Arrows Capital Ltd v Cheong Jun Yoong: Application to Set Aside Service of Claim Out of Jurisdiction Dismissed(Apr 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hing Shan Shan Blossom's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.5
Complex Cases: 8 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.2 parties avg	4.2	13%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	6%
Won	134.7 parties avg	4.7	81%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	25.3 parties avg	5.3
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2022	35.6 parties avg	5.6
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hing Shan Shan Blossom's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(13%)	13%
Partial	1(6%)	6%
Won	13(81%)	81%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	7,056,000.00	882,000.008 cases	8
USD	12,497,025.00	12,497,025.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Victory International v Borrelli: Receiver's Duties & Legal Profession Act Assessment 15 Jan 2025 Victory International Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant, Claimant)Partial	15 Jan 2025	Victory International Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant, Claimant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal partially allowed to the extent that CCPL is ordered to deliver its bill for assessment by the court.
2	DJY v DJZ: Injunction to Restrain Performance Bond Call \| Construction Dispute 25 Nov 2024 DJZ (Defendant)Won	25 Nov 2024	DJZ (Defendant): Application for injunction dismissedApplication for injunction against DJZ and the Bank dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Three Arrows Capital Ltd v Cheong Jun Yoong: Application to Set Aside Service of Claim Out of Jurisdiction Dismissed 11 Apr 2024 Cheong Jun Yoong (Respondent, Claimant)Won	11 Apr 2024	Cheong Jun Yoong (Respondent, Claimant): Costs awardedCosts awarded to the respondent in the amount of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	61 Robinson Pte Ltd v Viva Capital (SG) Pte Ltd: Winding Up Application for Unpaid Rent 30 Oct 2023 61 Robinson Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	30 Oct 2023	61 Robinson Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application allowedApplication for winding up order allowed; costs of $10,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be paid by the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Kuswandi Sudarga v Sutatno Sudarga: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Natural Forum Dispute 29 Nov 2022 Kuswandi Sudarga (Plaintiff)Won	29 Nov 2022	Kuswandi Sudarga (Plaintiff): Leave to serve writ of summons and statement of claim in Indonesia upheldAppeal dismissed with costs of SGD 15,000 plus disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Ong Chin Woon v Ong Bee Hah: Constructive & Resulting Trusts Dispute Over Family Property 23 May 2022 Ong Chin Ee (Defendant)Won	23 May 2022	Ong Chin Ee (Defendant): Claim dismissed with costsClaim dismissed with costs against Ong Chin Ee.
7	Re Brightoil Petroleum: Scheme of Arrangement under IRDA s 71 & Classification of Scheme Creditors with Lock-Up Agreements 17 Feb 2022 Brightoil Petroleum (S’pore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	17 Feb 2022	Brightoil Petroleum (S’pore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application grantedThe court approved the scheme of arrangement.
8	Shanghai Shipyard v Opus Tiger: Joinder in Derivative Action under Companies Act s 216A 23 Nov 2021 Reignwood International Investment (Group) Company Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Nov 2021	Reignwood International Investment (Group) Company Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe court dismissed the appeal, upholding the decision that the Judge had no power to order SSY’s joinder at the time the Joinder Applications were brought.
9	Reignwood v Opus Tiger: Joinder Application in Derivative Action 22 Jun 2021 Reignwood International Investment (Group) Co Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	22 Jun 2021	Reignwood International Investment (Group) Co Ltd (Plaintiff): Leave to commence derivative proceedings grantedReignwood was granted leave to commence derivative proceedings against Shanghai Shipyard Co Ltd.
10	Blasco Martinez Gemma v Ee Meng Yen Angela: Agency & Proof of Debt in Judicial Management of Epicentre Holdings 11 Nov 2020 Purandar Janampalli Rao (Defendant)Won	11 Nov 2020	Purandar Janampalli Rao (Defendant): WonCosts awarded to the Defendants, fixed at $5,500 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Teo Lay Gek v Hoang Trong Binh: Judicial Review of Valuation Dispute in Share Sale Agreement 26 Mar 2019 IPMM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Defendant)Lost	26 Mar 2019	IPMM (Singapore) Pte. Ltd. (Defendant): Application UnsuccessfulDefendants were ordered to pay US$4,165,675 plus interest to the plaintiffs.
12	Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement 19 Feb 2019 HealthSTATS International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Feb 2019	HealthSTATS International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence the derivative action is dismissed.
13	KLW Holdings Ltd v Straitsworld Advisory Ltd: Summary Judgment Appeal for Refundable Commitment Fee 23 Feb 2017 KLW Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	23 Feb 2017	KLW Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; summary judgment granted for the plaintiff in the sum of S$7,000,000 with interest and costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
14	Humpuss Sea Transport v PT Humpuss: Service of Process Out of Jurisdiction 28 May 2015 Another (Defendant)Lost	28 May 2015	Another (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendants’ application dismissed with costs fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	BNY v Celestial Nutrifoods: s285 Companies Act Examination of PwC 05 Aug 2014 Yit Chee Wah (Applicant)Won	05 Aug 2014	Yit Chee Wah (Applicant): Application AllowedThe liquidator's application to examine PwC was allowed.
16	Jurong Shipyard v BNP Paribas: Injunction Against Winding Up for Disputed Debt 05 Jun 2008 Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	05 Jun 2008	Jurong Shipyard Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Injunction GrantedInjunction granted to restrain BNP Paribas from commencing winding-up proceedings.