Ho Hua Chyi

Ho Hua Chyi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2007 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law and defamation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	14% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking Secrecy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Residential Property Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cooperative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unfair Dismissal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Hua Chyi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Hua Chyi has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	Tay Jui Chuan v Koh Joo Ann: Beneficial Ownership Dispute under Residential Property Act(Aug 2010) Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security: Defamation, Wrongful Dismissal & Subpoena Dispute(Apr 2010) Premier Security v Herman: Defamation Claim over Security Services(Sep 2009)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	17% of cases	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Undue Influence & Banking Secrecy(Oct 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Hua Chyi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.9 parties avg	3.9	50%
Won	33.2 parties avg	3.2	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	33.4 parties avg	3.4
2010	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Hua Chyi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	150,000.00	50,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tay Jui Chuan v Koh Joo Ann: Beneficial Ownership Dispute under Residential Property Act 18 Aug 2010 Inhil Investment Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Aug 2010	Inhil Investment Pte Ltd (Appellant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security: Defamation, Wrongful Dismissal & Subpoena Dispute 06 Apr 2010 Annie Leow Cher Kheng (Respondent)Lost	06 Apr 2010	Annie Leow Cher Kheng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the Judge and ordered a new trial on Basil's defences and his counterclaim.
3	Premier Security v Herman: Defamation Claim over Security Services 23 Sep 2009 Leow Cher Kheng (Plaintiff)Won	23 Sep 2009	Leow Cher Kheng (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Koh Joo Ann v First Grade Agency: Beneficial Ownership of Property Held on Trust Dispute 08 Apr 2009 First Grade Agency Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	08 Apr 2009	First Grade Agency Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedThe court dismissed the counterclaim of First Grade and Inhil.
5	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Undue Influence Claims 26 Feb 2009 American Express Bank Ltd (Respondent)Won	26 Feb 2009	American Express Bank Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs awarded to the respondent on a contractual basis.
6	Susilawati v American Express Bank: Undue Influence & Banking Secrecy 17 Oct 2007 American Express Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Oct 2007	American Express Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to the defendant on a standard basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.