Ho Jiayun

Ho Jiayun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial review and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 71.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Jiayun has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in administrative law and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Administrative Law	6 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Health Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Touting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Clang of the prison gates principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scandalising the court	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
False Imprisonment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assault and Battery	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Public Health Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
COVID-19 Policies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigating factors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Jiayun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Jiayun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	6 cases	100% of cases	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Disciplinary Tribunal's Duty to Investigate Touting Charges(Jan 2025) Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: False Imprisonment & Statutory Interpretation of Mental Health Act(Jan 2023) Han Hui Hui v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of COVID-19 Policies & Vaccination(Jun 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Jiayun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	17%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Won	53.8 parties avg	3.8	83%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Jiayun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	5(71%)	71%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	26,000.00	8,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Attorney-General v Shanmugam Manohar: Disciplinary Tribunal's Duty to Investigate Touting Charges 12 Jan 2025 Attorney-General (Appellant)Won	12 Jan 2025	Attorney-General (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe court allowed the appeal, setting aside the findings of the Second DT on the touting charges and ordering the Law Society to apply for the appointment of another Disciplinary Tribunal to hear and investigate the matter.
2	Mah Kiat Seng v Attorney-General: False Imprisonment & Statutory Interpretation of Mental Health Act 18 Jan 2023 Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant)Won	18 Jan 2023	Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe claim against Tan Thiam Chin Lawrence was dismissed.
3	Han Hui Hui v Attorney-General: Judicial Review of COVID-19 Policies & Vaccination 15 Jun 2022 Attorney-General’s Chambers (Respondent)Won	15 Jun 2022	Attorney-General’s Chambers (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for judicial review dismissed.
4	Leong Sow Hon v Public Prosecutor: Building Control Act Violation for Viaduct Structural Design Failure 28 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal against the six months’ imprisonment sentence.
5	Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Attorney-General: Contempt of Court & Freedom of Expression 15 Mar 2020 The Attorney-General (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2020	The Attorney-General (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part regarding Wham, with a cease-publication injunction granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Axis Law Corp v Intellectual Property Office: Judicial Review & Amendment of Trademark Statement 03 Jul 2016 Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (Defendant, Respondent)Won	03 Jul 2016	Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs of $5,000 and disbursements of $1,000 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).