Ho Jun Yang Joshua

Ho Jun Yang Joshua is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in res judicata and performance bond. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and res judicata.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extended doctrine of res judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Powers	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Accounting and Inquiry	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trustees	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Jun Yang Joshua has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Jun Yang Joshua has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PKWA Law Practice LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process(Jan 2022)
Niru & Co LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Trust Account, Res Judicata & Trustee Powers(Oct 2020)
He Junyang	1 cases	33% of cases	Rahman Mohammad Jillour v Paretam Singh: Account of Settlement Moneys & Solicitor's Bill of Costs(Feb 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Jun Yang Joshua's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Jun Yang Joshua's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,800,000.00	1,266,666.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process 04 Jan 2022 Etiqa Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	04 Jan 2022	Etiqa Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant): Order to PayOrder that Etiqa is to make payment of the sum of $3.8m to Goldbell, with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the filing of OS 335 until the date of this order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Rahman Mohammad Jillour v Paretam Singh: Account of Settlement Moneys & Solicitor's Bill of Costs 09 Feb 2021 Paretam Singh s/o Kishen Singh@ Pritam Singh Gill (Defendant)Won	09 Feb 2021	Paretam Singh s/o Kishen Singh@ Pritam Singh Gill (Defendant): Application refusedThe court refused the plaintiff's application and ordered the plaintiff to pay the defendant costs fixed at S$8,000 with disbursements fixed at S$1,047.66 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Bhojwani v Bhojwani: Trust Account, Res Judicata & Trustee Powers 07 Oct 2020 Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Plaintiff)Partial	07 Oct 2020	Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani (Plaintiff): Application granted in partHusband is to provide an account of the trust property until 9 January 2020 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).