Ho Lian-Yi

Ho Lian-Yi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in sentencing and constitutional law. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Children and Young Persons Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Medical)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mitigating factors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Clang of the prison gates principle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Regime	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reopening of concluded criminal appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
National Service Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Electricity Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Lian-Yi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Lian-Yi has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	100% of cases	Wee Teong Boo v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Evidentiary Decision(Jul 2022) Leong Sow Hon v Public Prosecutor: Building Control Act Violation for Viaduct Structural Design Failure(Oct 2020) Daniel De Costa Augustin v Public Prosecutor: Constitutional Law, Equality Before Law(Jun 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Lian-Yi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	13%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	13%
Won	62.5 parties avg	2.5	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Lian-Yi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Won	6(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wee Teong Boo v Singapore Medical Council: Judicial Review of Disciplinary Tribunal's Evidentiary Decision 18 Jul 2022 Attorney-General (Intervener)Neutral	18 Jul 2022	Attorney-General (Intervener): Application DismissedThe application for leave to seek a quashing order against the Admissibility Decision was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Leong Sow Hon v Public Prosecutor: Building Control Act Violation for Viaduct Structural Design Failure 28 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the appeal against the six months’ imprisonment sentence.
3	Daniel De Costa Augustin v Public Prosecutor: Constitutional Law, Equality Before Law 01 Jun 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Jun 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DeniedMotion denied; no monetary amount awarded.
4	Abdul Kahar bin Othman v Public Prosecutor: Reopening of Criminal Appeal & Constitutionality of Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Oct 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	24 Oct 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's criminal motion.
5	Public Prosecutor v Sakthikanesh: NS Default, Sentencing Benchmarks & Deterrence 23 Jul 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Applicant)Won	23 Jul 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Public Prosecutor's appeals against the sentences imposed on the respondents were allowed, and the sentences were enhanced.
6	Seng Foo Building Construction v Public Prosecutor: Electricity Act Offences & Sentencing Principles 27 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal by Seng Foo Building Construction Pte Ltd was dismissed.
7	Muhammad Zuhairie v PP: Sentencing of Young Offender, Reformative Training vs. Imprisonment & Caning 11 Jul 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	11 Jul 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the original sentence was dismissed.
8	Public Prosecutor v Andrew Koh Weiwen: Voluntarily Causing Hurt with Dangerous Weapon 23 May 2016 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Won	23 May 2016	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe Prosecution's appeal was allowed, and the Respondent's sentence was enhanced.