Ho Lifen

Ho Lifen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in prevention of corruption act and match-fixing.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Lifen has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and prevention of corruption act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	4 cases	16% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Match-fixing	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Sports Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Review of Detention	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Moneylending Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Lifen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Lifen has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann LLP	4 cases	80% of cases	Ding Si Yang v Public Prosecutor: Bail Pending Appeal for Corruption Charges(Feb 2015) Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act for Match-Fixing(Jan 2015) Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football(Jan 2015)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	20% of cases	PP v Syed Mostofa Romel: Corruption in Marine Surveying & Prevention of Corruption Act(Apr 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Lifen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	42.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Lifen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,500.00	8,500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Syed Mostofa Romel: Corruption in Marine Surveying & Prevention of Corruption Act 27 Apr 2015 Syed Mostofa Romel (Respondent)Lost	27 Apr 2015	Syed Mostofa Romel (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe Respondent's sentence was enhanced to six months' imprisonment for each of the two charges, to run concurrently.
2	Ding Si Yang v Public Prosecutor: Bail Pending Appeal for Corruption Charges 01 Feb 2015 Ding Si Yang (Applicant)Lost	01 Feb 2015	Ding Si Yang (Applicant): Motion dismissedThe Applicant's motion for bail pending appeal was dismissed.
3	Tan Seet Eng v Attorney-General: Review of Detention under Criminal Law (Temporary Provisions) Act for Match-Fixing 21 Jan 2015 Tan Seet Eng (Applicant)Lost	21 Jan 2015	Tan Seet Eng (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for an Order for Review of Detention was dismissed. The Applicant was ordered to pay the Attorney-General costs of $8,500, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Ding Si Yang v PP: Match-Fixing, Corruption, and Sentencing in Football 15 Jan 2015 Ding Si Yang (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	15 Jan 2015	Ding Si Yang (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed with respect to sentenceDing's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
5	Public Prosecutor v Lee Pit Chin: Unlicensed Moneylending by Estate Agent 19 Aug 2013 Lee Pit Chin (Respondent)Lost	19 Aug 2013	Lee Pit Chin (Respondent): Sentence EnhancedThe Respondent's imprisonment term was increased from three months to nine months for each of the two charges, to run concurrently, while the fine of $80,000 (12 weeks’ imprisonment in default) for each charge remains.