Ho Shao Hsien

Ho Shao Hsien is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in building and construction contracts and construction law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Shao Hsien has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Shao Hsien has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	1 cases	100% of cases	Milan International v Cluny Development: Performance Bond & Building Contract Dispute(Feb 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Shao Hsien's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Shao Hsien's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	10,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Milan International v Cluny Development: Performance Bond & Building Contract Dispute 12 Feb 2018 Milan International Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	12 Feb 2018	Milan International Pte Ltd (Applicant): Applications dismissedMilan's applications for an interim and final injunction were dismissed, and Milan was ordered to pay costs of $10,000 to Cluny (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).