Ho Thiam Huat

Ho Thiam Huat is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated expertise across 31 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and misuse of drugs act.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	7 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Privity of contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Motorcycle Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Illegality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Lights	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized98% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Thiam Huat has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Thiam Huat has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
T H Ho Law Chambers	6 cases	60% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj: Importation of Cannabis and Statutory Offences(Feb 2021) Zamri bin Mohd Tahir v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Application of Courier Exception under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2019) Mui Jia Jun v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Retrial Order(Oct 2018)
John Tay & Co	2 cases	20% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Irwan bin Ali: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Sep 2016) Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract(Jul 2006)
Khan & Co	2 cases	20% of cases	Joo Yong Co v Gajentheran: Determining Liability and Contributory Negligence in a Motor Vehicle Accident(Aug 2015) Gajentheran Marimuthu v Joo Yong Co: Negligence Claim for Motorcyclist Injuries at Tuas West Road Junction(Jan 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Thiam Huat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.3 parties avg	2.3	60%
Partial	23.5 parties avg	3.5	20%
Won	24.5 parties avg	4.5	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Thiam Huat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(60%)	60%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Won	2(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj: Importation of Cannabis and Statutory Offences 23 Feb 2021 Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj (Defendant)Lost	23 Feb 2021	Omar bin Yacob Bamadhaj (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted on the charge of importing cannabis.
2	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Diamorphine & Application of Courier Exception under Misuse of Drugs Act 10 Feb 2019 Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Appellant)Lost	10 Feb 2019	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
3	Mui Jia Jun v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Retrial Order 02 Oct 2018 Mui Jia Jun (Appellant)Partial	02 Oct 2018	Mui Jia Jun (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe appeal was allowed in part, and a retrial was ordered.
4	Public Prosecutor v. Abdul Ishak: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Mar 2018 Abdul Ishak bin Mohd Shah (Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2018	Abdul Ishak bin Mohd Shah (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of importing diamorphine; sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
5	Public Prosecutor v Zamri Bin Mohd Tahir: Drug Trafficking under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 May 2017 Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2017	Zamri bin Mohd Tahir (Defendant): ConvictedAccused convicted on Charge B1 and sentenced to death. The Defence's arguments for the Courier Exception were rejected, and the Prosecution did not provide a Certificate of Substantive Assistance.
6	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of abetment by instigation of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
7	Public Prosecutor v Irwan bin Ali: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Sep 2016 Irwan bin Ali (Defendant)Lost	08 Sep 2016	Irwan bin Ali (Defendant): ConvictedThe accused was convicted of the charge.
8	Joo Yong Co v Gajentheran: Determining Liability and Contributory Negligence in a Motor Vehicle Accident 03 Aug 2015 Gajentheran Marimuthu (by his mother and next friend Parai a/p Palaniappan) (Respondent, Plaintiff)Partial	03 Aug 2015	Gajentheran Marimuthu (by his mother and next friend Parai a/p Palaniappan) (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff reduced due to contributory negligenceThe court found the plaintiff contributorily negligent, reducing the damages awarded by 15%. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Gajentheran Marimuthu v Joo Yong Co: Negligence Claim for Motorcyclist Injuries at Tuas West Road Junction 18 Jan 2015 Gajentheran Marimuthu (by his mother and next friend Parai a/p Palaniappan) (Plaintiff)Won	18 Jan 2015	Gajentheran Marimuthu (by his mother and next friend Parai a/p Palaniappan) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
10	Lee Chee Wei v Tan Hor Peow Victor: Specific Performance & Illegality in Share Sale Contract 11 Jul 2006 Ong Ghim Choon (Defendant)Won	11 Jul 2006	Ong Ghim Choon (Defendant): Claim dismissed with costsThe claim against the second defendant is dismissed with costs.