Ho Wei Jie Vincent

Ho Wei Jie Vincent is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and contractual terms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and appeal.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Appeal	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Verbal Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common law derivative action	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ho Wei Jie Vincent has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ho Wei Jie Vincent has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Ang Hong Wei v Ang Teng Hai: Summary Judgment, Verbal Agreements & Property Sale(Jan 2024) Hou Chao v Gu Xiaolan: Striking Out, Common Law Derivative Action(Sep 2020) Chong Kum Heng v Public Prosecutor: CBT and CDSA Offences & Sentencing Appeal(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ho Wei Jie Vincent's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%
Won	35.4 parties avg	5.4	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ho Wei Jie Vincent's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	3(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ang Hong Wei v Ang Teng Hai: Summary Judgment, Verbal Agreements & Property Sale 18 Jan 2024 Ang Keng Been (Hong Qingming) (Defendant)Partial	18 Jan 2024	Ang Keng Been (Hong Qingming) (Defendant): Leave to Defend Granted ConditionallyLeave to defend granted for the balance of the claim of $387,800, conditional on providing a banker’s guarantee or a solicitor’s undertaking for the sum of $153,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Hou Chao v Gu Xiaolan: Striking Out, Common Law Derivative Action 15 Sep 2020 Yong Zhen Yuan Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2020	Yong Zhen Yuan Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Chong Kum Heng v Public Prosecutor: CBT and CDSA Offences & Sentencing Appeal 29 Jan 2020 Chong Kum Heng (Appellant)Partial	29 Jan 2020	Chong Kum Heng (Appellant): Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part.Appeal against conviction dismissed; appeal against sentence allowed in part. Aggregate sentence reduced from 39 months to 32 months.
4	Zillion Global v Deutsche Bank: Breach of Contract, Negligence, and Misrepresentation in Wealth Management 11 Jul 2019 Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant)Won	11 Jul 2019	Deutsche Bank AG, Singapore Branch (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant.
5	CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd v Ong Puay Koon: Contractual Term Interpretation & Indemnity 28 Nov 2017 Yap Tien Sung (Respondent, Appellant)Won	28 Nov 2017	Yap Tien Sung (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found that the indemnity clause did not make each party responsible for the breach of any term of the contract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.