Hoh Jian Yong

Hoh Jian Yong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and banking law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated expertise across 21 primary practice areas, with significant experience in evidence and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Evidence	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Medical Ethics	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held in bank	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hoh Jian Yong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hoh Jian Yong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice(May 2017) One Investment v Cham Poh Meng: Garnishee Order on Joint Account(May 2016) Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien: Medical Negligence, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Bolam-Bolitho Test(Feb 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hoh Jian Yong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	43.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hoh Jian Yong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin: Medical Negligence, Standard of Care, Doctor's Duty of Advice 11 May 2017 Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Respondent)Won	11 May 2017	Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	One Investment v Cham Poh Meng: Garnishee Order on Joint Account 29 May 2016 DBS Bank Ltd (Garnishee)Won	29 May 2016	DBS Bank Ltd (Garnishee): Appeal AllowedThe appeal against the Assistant Registrar's decision was allowed, meaning DBS Bank Ltd won and is not required to garnish the joint account. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Hii Chii Kok v Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien: Medical Negligence, Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors, Bolam-Bolitho Test 21 Feb 2016 Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Defendant)Won	21 Feb 2016	Ooi Peng Jin London Lucien (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the first defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
4	Chua Kok Tee David v DBS Bank: Fixed Deposit Dispute and Bank's Record-Keeping Practices 30 Jul 2015 DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant)Won	30 Jul 2015	DBS Bank Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiff's claim.