Howard Cheam

Howard Cheam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in legal ethics and professional responsibility and wills and probate. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Howard Cheam has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in legal ethics and professional responsibility and wills and probate.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Howard Cheam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Howard Cheam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Harry Elias Partnership	1 cases	50% of cases	Lim Boon Ming v Tiang Choo Yang: Probate of Will, Presumption of Destruction Animo Revocandi(Mar 2002)
Law Society	1 cases	50% of cases	Law Society v Quan Chee Seng: Disciplinary Action for Grossly Improper Conduct(Jun 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Howard Cheam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Howard Cheam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Law Society v Quan Chee Seng: Disciplinary Action for Grossly Improper Conduct 29 Jun 2003 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	29 Jun 2003	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application grantedOrder to show cause made absolute; Quan ordered to be struck off the rolls. No monetary amount awarded.
2	Lim Boon Ming v Tiang Choo Yang: Probate of Will, Presumption of Destruction Animo Revocandi 14 Mar 2002 Tiang Choo Yang (Defendant)Lost	14 Mar 2002	Tiang Choo Yang (Defendant): Counterclaim dismissedThe Defendant's Counterclaim for grant of letters of administration was dismissed.