Huineng Clement Chen

Huineng Clement Chen is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Principles	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unincorporated Associations	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Ultra vires	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Investment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Huineng Clement Chen has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Huineng Clement Chen has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bih Li & Lee LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital Management: Fiduciary Duties & Investment Agreement Dispute(Aug 2021) Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital: Agent's Duties & Investment Advice(Feb 2021) Vaz Lorrain v. Singapore Rifle Assn: Breach of Mediation Agreement & Offer to Settle(Nov 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Huineng Clement Chen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	60%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Huineng Clement Chen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(60%)	60%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	36,000.00	12,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital Management: Fiduciary Duties & Investment Agreement Dispute 23 Aug 2021 Tonny Permana (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	23 Aug 2021	Tonny Permana (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the Respondents fixed at $36,000 (all-in). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Tonny Permana v One Tree Capital: Agent's Duties & Investment Advice 15 Feb 2021 Tonny Permana (Plaintiff)Lost	15 Feb 2021	Tonny Permana (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims dismissed with costs to the defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Vaz Lorrain v. Singapore Rifle Assn: Breach of Mediation Agreement & Offer to Settle 19 Nov 2020 Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Nov 2020	Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed. The Judge’s award of $8,100 in damages is set aside and nominal damages of $1,000 is awarded to SRA. Mr Vaz is entitled to the Post-OTS Costs on an indemnity basis to the extent set out at [82] above. Unless the parties are able to come to an agreement within 14 days of the date of this judgment, we remit the issue of the quantum of the Post-OTS Costs to the Judge. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Michael Vaz Lorrain v Singapore Rifle Association: Offer to Settle & Discontinuance After Judgment 19 Jul 2020 Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant)Won	19 Jul 2020	Michael Vaz Lorrain (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowedThe court held that SRA's acceptance of the OTS on 5 May 2020 was not valid.
5	Singapore Rifle Association v Singapore Shooting Association: Breach of Contract, Indemnity Clauses, Conspiracy 23 Jan 2019 Yap Beng Hui (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2019	Yap Beng Hui (Defendant): Damages to be paidMr Vaz, Mr Yap and Mr Chen are to pay SRA damages in the amount equivalent to the legal fees and disbursements incurred by SRA in investigating and responding to the conspiracy, such fees and disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.