Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz

Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and non-disclosure of material facts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Pathological arbitration clause	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Non-disclosure of material facts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Hybrid arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Arrest of Vessel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
H.A. & Chung Partnership	3 cases	100% of cases	The "Genius Star II": Setting Aside Warrant of Arrest for Non-Disclosure of Material Facts in Admiralty Claim(Oct 2013) HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings: Stay of Proceedings and Security for Costs in Pathological Arbitration Clause Dispute(Mar 2013) HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Clause Interpretation(Feb 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Stayed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	32.3 parties avg	2.3

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hussainar bin K. Abdul Aziz's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Neutral	1(33%)	33%
Stayed	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	30,000.00	15,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Stayed: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	The "Genius Star II": Setting Aside Warrant of Arrest for Non-Disclosure of Material Facts in Admiralty Claim 16 Oct 2013 Impa Marina Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	16 Oct 2013	Impa Marina Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the Warrant of Arrest allowed. The security provided by the Defendant to the Plaintiff for the release of the Vessel is to be returned to the Defendant. Costs of this application are fixed at S$5,000, inclusive of disbursements, payable by the Plaintiff to the Defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings: Stay of Proceedings and Security for Costs in Pathological Arbitration Clause Dispute 21 Mar 2013 Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	21 Mar 2013	Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Proceedings StayedProceedings stayed in favour of arbitration, conditioned on furnishing security for costs of $25,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	HKL Group Co Ltd v Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration Clause Interpretation 18 Feb 2013 Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant)Stayed	18 Feb 2013	Rizq International Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant): Proceedings stayed in favour of arbitrationProceedings stayed in favour of arbitration, conditional on parties securing agreement from an arbitral institution in Singapore to conduct a hybrid arbitration applying the ICC rules.