Ian Teo Ke-Wei

Ian Teo Ke-Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2006 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and marine propulsion units. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and commercial law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Marine Propulsion Units	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Warranty Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ian Teo Ke-Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ian Teo Ke-Wei has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Anglo-American Corp v London Steam-ship: Striking Out Claims for Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation(Sep 2018)
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Pacific Marine v Xin Ming Hua: Defective Marine Propulsion Units & Breach of Contract(May 2014)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	33% of cases	Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Arbitration(Nov 2006)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ian Teo Ke-Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ian Teo Ke-Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,085,748.06	3,085,748.061 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Anglo-American Corp v London Steam-ship: Striking Out Claims for Breach of Contract & Misrepresentation 10 Sep 2018 A. Bilbrough & Co Ltd (Respondent)Partial	10 Sep 2018	A. Bilbrough & Co Ltd (Respondent): Partial WinThe Misrepresentation Claim against D1 and D2, as well as the claim in fraudulent misrepresentation against D4, are struck out. The proposed inclusion of the claim in unjust enrichment, and the claim regarding good faith against D1 and D2 are disallowed. The Contractual claim against D1 and D2 is not struck out, except for the pleading that there is an express term (c) in the alleged contract.
2	Pacific Marine v Xin Ming Hua: Defective Marine Propulsion Units & Breach of Contract 25 May 2014 Pacific Marine & Shipbuilding Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	25 May 2014	Pacific Marine & Shipbuilding Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $3,085,748.06 (SGD) and US$307,188.90. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Swift-Fortune Ltd v Magnifica Marine SA: Mareva Injunction & Foreign Arbitration 30 Nov 2006 Swift-Fortune Ltd (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2006	Swift-Fortune Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of Judith Prakash J was dismissed with costs.