Ibsen Low

Ibsen Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and misrepresentation.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ibsen Low has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Unilateral mistake	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Commercial Transactions	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ibsen Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ibsen Low has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Veritas Law Corporation	2 cases	100% of cases	Broadley Construction v Alacran Design: Contract Dispute over Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Unilateral Mistake(May 2018) SCT Technologies v Western Copper: Burden of Proof in Debt Recovery for Unpaid Invoices(Jan 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ibsen Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ibsen Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Broadley Construction v Alacran Design: Contract Dispute over Fraudulent Misrepresentation and Unilateral Mistake 15 May 2018 Alacran Design Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 May 2018	Alacran Design Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Alacran is ordered to pay Broadley costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements.
2	SCT Technologies v Western Copper: Burden of Proof in Debt Recovery for Unpaid Invoices 04 Jan 2016 WESTERN COPPER CO LTD (Respondent)Lost	04 Jan 2016	WESTERN COPPER CO LTD (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Western Copper to pay costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.