Ignatius Joseph

Ignatius Joseph is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and resulting trusts. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated expertise across 32 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Resulting Trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Parenting	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common intention constructive trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Presumed Resulting Trusts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Apartment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ignatius Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ignatius Joseph has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ignatius J & Associates	3 cases	50% of cases	Poh Leong Soon v SL Hair & Beauty: Winding Up Application Based on Director's Conduct and Just & Equitable Grounds(Apr 2018) Pereira v. Faridah: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Property Dispute(Jul 2017) Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute(Feb 2010)
A Rajandran Joseph & Nayar	2 cases	33% of cases	G v R: Custody Dispute - Welfare of Child, Parental Mental Health, and Tender Years Doctrine(Sep 2003) Shoba D/O Gunasekaran v A Rajandran: Child Custody Dispute(Jun 2001)
A Rajandran Joseph and Nayar	1 cases	17% of cases	Quek Hong Yap v Quek Bee Leng: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Affairs(Jun 2005)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ignatius Joseph's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.7 parties avg	4.7	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ignatius Joseph's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(33%)	33%
Partial	1(17%)	17%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	2,500.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Poh Leong Soon v SL Hair & Beauty: Winding Up Application Based on Director's Conduct and Just & Equitable Grounds 26 Apr 2018 SL Hair & Beauty Slimming Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	26 Apr 2018	SL Hair & Beauty Slimming Centre Pte Ltd (Defendant): Winding up application dismissedWinding up application dismissed; received costs of $10,000 (inclusive of disbursements) from the Plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Pereira v. Faridah: Resulting & Constructive Trusts in Property Dispute 12 Jul 2017 Pereira, Dennis John Sunny (Plaintiff)Partial	12 Jul 2017	Pereira, Dennis John Sunny (Plaintiff): Partial JudgmentThe Plaintiff was declared the sole beneficial owner of the Aston Residence and the Queen’s Road HDB. The Plaintiff and Defendant are joint tenants in equity in respect of the Changi Court property and the Toh Crescent property. The Plaintiff’s claim for losses or damages allegedly caused on occasion of the Defendant’s refusal to sign the re-financing documents was declined.
3	Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute 28 Feb 2010 INDIRA D/O SRINIVASA NAIDU (Defendant)Lost	28 Feb 2010	INDIRA D/O SRINIVASA NAIDU (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the Plaintiff was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Quek Hong Yap v Quek Bee Leng: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Company Affairs 22 Jun 2005 Quek Hong Yap (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Jun 2005	Quek Hong Yap (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's action for relief under s 216 of the Companies Act was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	G v R: Custody Dispute - Welfare of Child, Parental Mental Health, and Tender Years Doctrine 08 Sep 2003 R (Respondent)Won	08 Sep 2003	R (Respondent): Custody GrantedSole custody, care and control of the son granted to the respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Shoba D/O Gunasekaran v A Rajandran: Child Custody Dispute 18 Jun 2001 A Rajandran (Respondent)Won	18 Jun 2001	A Rajandran (Respondent): Interim custody, care and control of the child grantedInterim custody, care and control of the child granted.