Indulekshmi Rajeswari

Indulekshmi Rajeswari is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and criminal law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in constitutional law and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Constitutional Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Petrochemical Patents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Validity of Patents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Inventive Steps	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Prior Art	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Experimentation Results	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Human Sexuality	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Indulekshmi Rajeswari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Indulekshmi Rajeswari has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Syntroleum v Neste Oil: Patent Infringement, Validity, and Disclosure(Sep 2014)
Peter Low LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights(Apr 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Indulekshmi Rajeswari's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Indulekshmi Rajeswari's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Syntroleum v Neste Oil: Patent Infringement, Validity, and Disclosure 29 Sep 2014 Neste Oil Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	29 Sep 2014	Neste Oil Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Applications DismissedDefendant's applications for disclosure were dismissed without prejudice.
2	Lim Meng Suang v Attorney-General: Constitutionality of Section 377A & LGBTQ+ Rights 08 Apr 2013 Kenneth Chee Mun-Leon (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Apr 2013	Kenneth Chee Mun-Leon (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim that s 377A is unconstitutional and infringes their rights under Art 12 was dismissed.