Intekhab Khan

Intekhab Khan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in statutory demand and building and construction contracts. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Intekhab Khan has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and bankruptcy.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	8 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Back charges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Consent Order	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sub-Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconsumed Leave	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Intekhab Khan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Intekhab Khan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
J Koh & Co	9 cases	90% of cases	Cheng Poh Building Construction v First City Builders: Stay of Execution on Judgment Sum(Nov 2002) Seng Hock Heng Contractor v Hup Seng Bee Construction: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call(Jul 2002) Sia Leng Yuen v HKR Properties: Appeal to Set Aside Statutory Demand Over Guarantee of Loan(Nov 2001)
M and A Law Corporation	1 cases	10% of cases	Kotjo Johanes Budisutrisno v International Factors Leasing: Bankruptcy Petition Amendment & Jurisdiction(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Intekhab Khan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Lost	72.3 parties avg	2.3	70%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	62.2 parties avg	2.2
2002	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Intekhab Khan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(10%)	10%
Lost	7(70%)	70%
Won	2(20%)	20%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,100.00	620.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	6 42	Lost: 4 cases (66.7%) Won: 2 cases (33.3%)
2002	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Kotjo Johanes Budisutrisno v International Factors Leasing: Bankruptcy Petition Amendment & Jurisdiction 13 Jun 2004 Kotjo Johanes Budisutrisno (Debtor, Appellant)Lost	13 Jun 2004	Kotjo Johanes Budisutrisno (Debtor, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $700 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Cheng Poh Building Construction v First City Builders: Stay of Execution on Judgment Sum 18 Nov 2002 Cheng Poh Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	18 Nov 2002	Cheng Poh Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the stay of execution was dismissed.
3	Seng Hock Heng Contractor v Hup Seng Bee Construction: Injunction Against Performance Bond Call 16 Jul 2002 Seng Hock Heng Contractor Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Jul 2002	Seng Hock Heng Contractor Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application for an injunction was dismissed.
4	Sia Leng Yuen v HKR Properties: Appeal to Set Aside Statutory Demand Over Guarantee of Loan 22 Nov 2001 Sia Leng Yuen (Appellant)Lost	22 Nov 2001	Sia Leng Yuen (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $1,200 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Sia Leng Yuen v HKR Properties Ltd: Appeal Against Statutory Demand for Guarantor's Debt 31 Oct 2001 Sia Leng Yuen (Appellant)Lost	31 Oct 2001	Sia Leng Yuen (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $1,200 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Security for Costs Application 24 Sep 2001 United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	24 Sep 2001	United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal WonThe appeal against the order for security for costs was allowed.
7	L & M Concrete Specialists v United Eng Contractors: Security for Costs Application 24 Sep 2001 United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	24 Sep 2001	United Eng Contractors Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedUnited Eng's appeal was allowed, and the order for security of costs was set aside.
8	Kotjo v Ng Wei Teck: Striking Out Claim for Unused Leave in Judicial Management 16 Aug 2001 Johannes Budisutrisno Kotjo (Appellant)Lost	16 Aug 2001	Johannes Budisutrisno Kotjo (Appellant): Appeal dismissedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed.
9	Sim Bok Huat Royston v PP: Corruption, Police Officer, Evidence Act, Witness Statements 01 Apr 2001 Sim Bok Huat Royston (Appellant)Lost	01 Apr 2001	Sim Bok Huat Royston (Appellant): Appeal dismissed
10	United Eng Contractors v L & M Concrete: Rectification Works Dispute 27 Apr 2000 L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	27 Apr 2000	L & M Concrete Specialists Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Struck OutDefendant's counterclaim was struck out with liberty to institute fresh proceedings. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.