Ismail bin Atan

Ismail bin Atan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2005 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and damages assessment. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Infringement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Groundless threat	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inventions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Validity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fibromyalgia	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Merchantable Quality	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cheque Truncation System	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ismail bin Atan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ismail bin Atan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	4 cases	57% of cases	WBG Network v Sunny Daisy: Summary Judgment & Admissibility of Evidence(Jan 2007) Sunny Daisy Ltd v WBG Network: Summary Judgment Appeal on Debt for Goods Sold(Jul 2006) SM Trading v Intersanctuary: Conspiracy & Fiduciary Duty in Columbarium Contract Dispute(Jun 2006)
Salem Ibrahim LLC	3 cases	43% of cases	Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless Threat(Mar 2017) Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome(May 2015) Lim Kok Leong v Seen Joo Company: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Companies Act(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ismail bin Atan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	43%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	43%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ismail bin Atan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	731,376.66	121,896.116 cases	6
USD	611,764.03	611,764.031 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Tat Cheng v Maka GPS Technologies: Patent Infringement, Validity & Groundless Threat 12 Mar 2017 Lee Tat Cheng (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	12 Mar 2017	Lee Tat Cheng (Plaintiff, Respondent): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for patent infringement was dismissed.
2	Mykytowych v V I P Hotel: Negligence Claim for Hotel Lobby Slip and Fall Resulting in Knee Fracture and Alleged Complex Regional Pain Syndrome 18 May 2015 Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Plaintiff)Partial	18 May 2015	Pamela Jane Mykytowych (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $9,005.115 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Lim Kok Leong v Seen Joo Company: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Companies Act 13 Nov 2014 LIM KOK LEONG (Plaintiff)Won	13 Nov 2014	LIM KOK LEONG (Plaintiff): Application grantedPlaintiff's application to inspect the accounting and other records of the Company was granted. The defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the application fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	WBG Network v Sunny Daisy: Summary Judgment & Admissibility of Evidence 11 Jan 2007 WBG Network (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	11 Jan 2007	WBG Network (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Sunny Daisy Ltd v WBG Network: Summary Judgment Appeal on Debt for Goods Sold 25 Jul 2006 WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	25 Jul 2006	WBG Network (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed and judgment granted to the plaintiff in the sum of US$611,764.03 and interest at 6% per annum from the date of issue of the writ till date of judgment.
6	SM Trading v Intersanctuary: Conspiracy & Fiduciary Duty in Columbarium Contract Dispute 14 Jun 2006 Intersanctuary Ltd (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2006	Intersanctuary Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on counterclaimJudgment for the defendant on its counterclaim for $142,750 plus interest at 6% per annum from the date of the writ. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	City Hardware v Goh Boon Chye: Cheque Truncation System & Negotiable Instruments 30 Jan 2005 City Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	30 Jan 2005	City Hardware Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $576,621.54 with interest accruing at the rate of 6% per annum from 8 March 2004 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).