Ismail Hamid

Ismail Hamid is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2018. The lawyer has handled 15 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 20% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ismail Hamid has demonstrated expertise across 35 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	13 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	8 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Murder	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Young Offenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Robbery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Domestic Maid Abuse	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Registration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Medical Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traditional Chinese Medicine Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Firefighting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Child Witness Testimony	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mediation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Medicare and Medicaid	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ismail Hamid has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ismail Hamid has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ismail Hamid & Co	10 cases	67% of cases	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016) PP v Muhammad Fadly: Rape of Intoxicated Victim at Duxton Hotel(Aug 2016) Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Anwar: Maid Abuse Case Appeal(Sep 2015)
Ismail Hamid and Co	4 cases	27% of cases	Mohd Halmi v PP: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2005) PP v Mohd Halmi: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumptions(Aug 2005) PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death(Jul 2005)
A. Rohim Noor Lila LLP	1 cases	7% of cases	Public Prosecutor v. Abdul Ishak: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Mar 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ismail Hamid's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 3 (20%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	142.9 parties avg	2.9	93%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2005	43.3 parties avg	3.3
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ismail Hamid's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	14(93%)	93%
Partial	1(7%)	7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 15 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v. Abdul Ishak: Importation of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Mar 2018 Abdul Ishak bin Mohd Shah (Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2018	Abdul Ishak bin Mohd Shah (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of importing diamorphine; sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
2	PP v Selamat Bin Paki: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 19 Oct 2016 Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Defendant)Lost	19 Oct 2016	Ali bin Mohamad Bahashwan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedFound guilty of abetment by instigation of trafficking in a controlled drug, namely, diamorphine.
3	PP v Muhammad Fadly: Rape of Intoxicated Victim at Duxton Hotel 21 Aug 2016 Muhammad Fadly Bin Abdull Wahab (Defendant)Lost	21 Aug 2016	Muhammad Fadly Bin Abdull Wahab (Defendant): Accused sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.Accused sentenced to 13 years of imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.
4	Public Prosecutor v Rosman bin Anwar: Maid Abuse Case Appeal 24 Sep 2015 Khairani binte Abdul Rahman (Appellant)Lost	24 Sep 2015	Khairani binte Abdul Rahman (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction dismissed; sentence increased from four to eight weeks' imprisonment.
5	Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal Dismissed 12 Oct 2011 Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus (Appellant)Lost	12 Oct 2011	Kamrul Hasan Abdul Quddus (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the conviction of murder was dismissed.
6	Huang Danmin v Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioners Board: Professional Misconduct & TCM Practice 17 May 2010 Huang Danmin (Appellant)Lost	17 May 2010	Huang Danmin (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
7	Public Prosecutor v Yusry Shah bin Jamal: Robbery, Sentencing, and Rehabilitation of Young Offenders 30 Oct 2007 Yusry Shah bin Jamal (Respondent)Lost	30 Oct 2007	Yusry Shah bin Jamal (Respondent): Probation Order SubstitutedThe probation order made by the district judge was substituted with a sentence of reformative training with immediate effect.
8	Mohamad Iskandar v PP: Firefighter's Rash Act Causing Death - Sentencing Principles 07 Sep 2006 Mohamad Iskandar bin Basri (Appellant)Partial	07 Sep 2006	Mohamad Iskandar bin Basri (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartImprisonment sentence reduced from 15 months to 7 months; disqualification from driving remains at 8 years.
9	Mohd Halmi v PP: Trafficking in Controlled Drugs & Presumptions under Misuse of Drugs Act 08 Dec 2005 Mohamad bin Ahmad (Appellant)Lost	08 Dec 2005	Mohamad bin Ahmad (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed as the court was not persuaded by the arguments presented by the second appellant's counsel.
10	PP v Mohd Halmi: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumptions 11 Aug 2005 Mohamad bin Ahmad (Defendant)Lost	11 Aug 2005	Mohamad bin Ahmad (Defendant): Convicted and sentencedFound guilty on the charge of trafficking in diamorphine.
11	PP v Lim Poh Lye: Murder Conviction Upheld for Robbery Resulting in Death 14 Jul 2005 Lim Poh Lye (Respondent)Lost	14 Jul 2005	Lim Poh Lye (Respondent): Convicted of MurderConvicted of murder under s 302, read with s 34, of the Penal Code, which carries the mandatory death penalty.
12	Public Prosecutor v Lim Poh Lye: Culpable Homicide, Common Intention, and Murder Charge 23 Jan 2005 Lim Poh Lye (Defendant)Lost	23 Jan 2005	Lim Poh Lye (Defendant): Guilty of robbery with hurtFound guilty of an offence under Section 394 of the Penal Code (robbery with hurt).
13	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Ridwan: Sentencing for Grievous Hurt with Dangerous Weapons under Penal Code 04 Mar 2003 Mohamed Ridwan Bin Omar (Defendant)Lost	04 Mar 2003	Mohamed Ridwan Bin Omar (Defendant): Sentence of imprisonment and caningSentenced to eight years’ imprisonment and eight strokes of the cane.
14	B v Public Prosecutor: Child Molestation Case - Reliability of Child Witness Testimony 08 Dec 2002 B (Appellant)Lost	08 Dec 2002	B (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction was dismissed.
15	Koh Kim Eng v Lim Geok Yian: Constructive Trust & Immovable Property Dispute 19 Aug 2001 Lim Geok Yian (Defendant)Lost	19 Aug 2001	Lim Geok Yian (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.