Ivan Lim

Ivan Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and costs. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 13% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ivan Lim has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mistake	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation of Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Algorithmic Trading	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Interim payments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Directors	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Purchaser's Lien	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reliance Loss	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cryptocurrency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ivan Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ivan Lim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	7 cases	88% of cases	Ong v Lim: Trustee's Application for Inspection of Banker's Books in Bankruptcy(Feb 2023) B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust, and Interim Payments(Sep 2019) B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust, and Equitable Compensation(May 2019)
Allen & Gledhill	1 cases	13% of cases	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cryptocurrency Trading Dispute(Jul 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ivan Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 1 (13%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.5 parties avg	2.5	75%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ivan Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(75%)	75%
Partial	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	329,254.30	82,313.584 cases	4
USD	4,000,000.00	4,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ong v Lim: Trustee's Application for Inspection of Banker's Books in Bankruptcy 14 Feb 2023 Lim Lie Hoa also known as Lim Le Hoa also known as Lily Arief Husni (Defendant)Lost	14 Feb 2023	Lim Lie Hoa also known as Lim Le Hoa also known as Lily Arief Husni (Defendant): Applications GrantedThe court granted the plaintiff's applications for inspection of banker's books.
2	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust, and Interim Payments 11 Sep 2019 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	11 Sep 2019	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Interim payment and costs to be paidOrdered to pay US$4,000,000 as interim payment and costs to be assessed. Assumed USD as the interim payment was calculated in USD.
3	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Breach of Trust, and Equitable Compensation 13 May 2019 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 May 2019	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Liable for breach of contract and breach of trustDefendant found liable for breach of contract and breach of trust; the amount of damages or equitable compensation to be assessed at a further hearing (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract, Mistake, and Breach of Trust in Cryptocurrency Exchange 13 Mar 2019 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	13 Mar 2019	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): LostJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be assessed at a later hearing. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	B2C2 Ltd v Quoine Pte Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cryptocurrency Trading Dispute 17 Jul 2018 Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	17 Jul 2018	Quoine Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application for security for costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Mukherjee v DyStar: Director's Right to Inspect Company Records under Section 199 of the Companies Act 18 Dec 2017 Mukherjee Amitava (Plaintiff)Lost	18 Dec 2017	Mukherjee Amitava (Plaintiff): Application dismissedApplication to inspect company records was dismissed with costs. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale 14 May 2017 PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 May 2017	PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Caveat to remain unless the defendant is able to provide an alternative form of securityThe court ordered that the caveat remain in place pending the outcome of Suit 898, unless the defendant provides security for the plaintiff's claim for the return of the deposit in the amount of $4,066,000.
8	Out of the Box v Wanin Industries: Breach of Contract & Damages for Defective Sports Drink 03 May 2012 Out of the Box Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	03 May 2012	Out of the Box Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffDamages awarded in the amount of $329,254.30 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).