Ivan Qiu

Ivan Qiu is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and contract law. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ivan Qiu has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in corporate law and patents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Corporate Law	2 cases	15% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Patents	2 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contracts of indemnity	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Inventorship	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Patent Entitlement	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ivan Qiu has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ivan Qiu has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Straits Law Practice LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Indemnity & Guarantee Dispute(Feb 2019) National University Hospital v Cicada Cube: Patent Ownership Dispute over Laboratory Specimen Collection System(Mar 2017)
Straits Law Practice	1 cases	33% of cases	Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital: Patent Ownership Dispute(Aug 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ivan Qiu's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ivan Qiu's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liberty Sky Investments v Goh Seng Heng: Indemnity & Guarantee Dispute 19 Feb 2019 Aesthetic Medical Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Feb 2019	Aesthetic Medical Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Cicada Cube Pte Ltd v National University Hospital: Patent Ownership Dispute 27 Aug 2018 Cicada Cube Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	27 Aug 2018	Cicada Cube Pte Ltd (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Cicada Cube remains a joint proprietor of the patent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	National University Hospital v Cicada Cube: Patent Ownership Dispute over Laboratory Specimen Collection System 13 Mar 2017 Cicada Cube Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	13 Mar 2017	Cicada Cube Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial JudgmentCicada Cube was named as a joint proprietor of the Patent together with NUH.