J Balachandran

J Balachandran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and civil practice. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

J Balachandran has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Interpleader	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sale and Lease Back	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Balachandran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

J Balachandran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ramdas & Wong	2 cases	67% of cases	Spanners International v Laredo: Caveat Removal Dispute over Sale and Leaseback Agreement(Aug 2008) Tai Kim San v Lim Cher Kia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Misrepresentation in Share Sale(Dec 2000)
Ramdas and Wong	1 cases	33% of cases	Australia and New Zealand Banking Group v Ding Pei Chai: Interpleader Relief and Authority to Operate Bank Account(Jun 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of J Balachandran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of J Balachandran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	10,000.00	5,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Spanners International v Laredo: Caveat Removal Dispute over Sale and Leaseback Agreement 07 Aug 2008 Spanners International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	07 Aug 2008	Spanners International Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffCaveat to be removed by 31 March 2008; costs of $10,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Australia and New Zealand Banking Group v Ding Pei Chai: Interpleader Relief and Authority to Operate Bank Account 29 Jun 2004 Cheng Wai Yong (Respondent)Partial	29 Jun 2004	Cheng Wai Yong (Respondent): PartialThe moneys in the ACU deposit account no 468488 are to be retained in the account until further order.
3	Tai Kim San v Lim Cher Kia: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Misrepresentation in Share Sale 11 Dec 2000 Tai Kim San (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Dec 2000	Tai Kim San (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages/accounts of profits due to the defendant's alleged breach of fiduciary duties was dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).