J Sathia

J Sathia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in security for costs and civil procedure.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

J Sathia has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Interlocutory Appeals	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	J Sathia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

J Sathia has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen and Gledhill	1 cases	100% of cases	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Security for Costs & Admission of Fresh Evidence in Interlocutory Appeals(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of J Sathia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of J Sathia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Jurong Town Corp v Wishing Star Ltd: Security for Costs & Admission of Fresh Evidence in Interlocutory Appeals 30 Mar 2004 Jurong Town Corp (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2004	Jurong Town Corp (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedJTC's appeal against the High Court's decision to deny security for costs was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.