Jaime Pang

Jaime Pang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 9 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and criminal law. Their track record shows a 89.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 22% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jaime Pang has demonstrated expertise across 12 primary practice areas, with significant experience in misuse of drugs act and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Misuse of Drugs Act	9 cases	21% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 21% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	8 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	7 cases	16% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	6 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Appeal	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jaime Pang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jaime Pang has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	8 cases	89% of cases	PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2023) Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Methamphetamine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2022) Public Prosecutor v Gunalan Goval: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Apr 2022)
Prosecution	1 cases	11% of cases	PP v Poopathi Chinaiyah: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jaime Pang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 2 (22%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	11%
Won	82.6 parties avg	2.6	89%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jaime Pang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(11%)	11%
Won	8(89%)	89%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 9 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Yogesswaran & Teo: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Jun 2023 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Jun 2023	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): ConvictionBoth accused convicted on the charges against them.
2	Muhamad Azmi bin Kamil v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking Methamphetamine under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Oct 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Oct 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence imposed on the appellant.
3	Public Prosecutor v Gunalan Goval: Trafficking of Cannabis under the Misuse of Drugs Act 24 Apr 2022 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Apr 2022	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of the charge.
4	Roshdi bin Abdullah Altway v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking, Material Witness Disclosure, and Bailment of Drugs 10 Nov 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Nov 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against Roshdi's conviction and sentence.
5	Reduan v Public Prosecutor: Drug Trafficking Appeal under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Jun 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Jun 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeals by Mohammad Reduan bin Mustaffar and Nazeeha binte Abu Hasan were dismissed.
6	Public Prosecutor v Yogeswaran Wairan: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Apr 2021 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Apr 2021	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 25 years’ imprisonment and the mandatory 15 strokes of the cane.
7	PP v Poopathi Chinaiyah: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Feb 2020 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	18 Feb 2020	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted on all charges.
8	PP v Tan Swim Hong: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Sentencing 14 Oct 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	14 Oct 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAll accused persons were convicted.
9	Cheang Geok Lin v. Public Prosecutor: Appeal Against Excessive Sentencing for Drug Possession and Consumption 03 Jan 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	03 Jan 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; sentence for Enhanced Possession Charge reduced, sentence of 12 weeks’ imprisonment in lieu of caning set aside, sentence for LT-2 Charge affirmed.