Jaime Tey

Jaime Tey is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2002. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and trust law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jaime Tey has demonstrated expertise across 5 primary practice areas, with significant experience in winding up and mistake of fact.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Winding Up	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jaime Tey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Mistake of fact	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jaime Tey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jaime Tey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jaime Tey has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Constructive Trust	1 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jaime Tey has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jaime Tey has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Pinkroccade v. P.T. HM Sampoerna: Mistaken Payment & Constructive Trust in Winding Up(Aug 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jaime Tey's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jaime Tey's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	112,472.00	112,472.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Pinkroccade v. P.T. HM Sampoerna: Mistaken Payment & Constructive Trust in Winding Up 20 Aug 2002 Pinkroccade Educational Services Pte Ltd (formerly known as PDA Pink Elephant Pte Ltd)(in creditors' voluntary winding up) (Respondent)Neutral	20 Aug 2002	Pinkroccade Educational Services Pte Ltd (formerly known as PDA Pink Elephant Pte Ltd)(in creditors' voluntary winding up) (Respondent): Sanction given to make payment to claimantSanction was given to the liquidators to make payment of AUD112,472.00 to the claimant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.