Jainil Bhandari

Jainil Bhandari is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in shipping law and admiralty and maritime law. Their track record shows a 58.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated expertise across 45 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and shipping law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	12 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Arbitral Award	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Marine Insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maritime Collision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Metal Commodities Trading	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpleader Relief	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ship Repair Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Formation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jainil Bhandari has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jainil Bhandari has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	33% of cases	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes(Nov 2002) Feng Hang: COSCO Breached Contract by Issuing Second Bill of Lading, Causation Dispute(Dec 2001) Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Scope of Insurance Policy for Ship Repairers' Liability(Sep 2000)
Rajah and Tann	3 cases	25% of cases	AP Moller-Maersk v Special Entertainment: Interpleader, Cargo Claims & Storage Charges(Jan 2005) Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Discovery of Documents and Summary Judgment Appeal(Sep 2004) Hua Seng Sawmill v QBE Insurance: Marine Insurance, Insurable Interest & Washing Overboard(Oct 2003)
Rajah & Tann LLP	2 cases	17% of cases	Gentian Shipping Inc v The "Orinoco Star": Extension of Time for Maritime Claim Due to Collision(Aug 2014) Subiaco v Baker Hughes: Interpretation of 'Free In Stowed' Term in Shipping Contract(Sep 2010)
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	BVU v BVX: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud and Public Policy Violation(Mar 2019)
Rajah & Tan Singapore LLP	1 cases	8% of cases	BDG v BDH: Injunction to Restrain Winding Up Application Due to Arbitration Clause(Sep 2016)
Khattar Wong & Partners	1 cases	8% of cases	Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Ship Repairer's Insurance Claim(Jan 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jainil Bhandari's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.9 parties avg	2.9	42%
Won	73.4 parties avg	3.4	58%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2002	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jainil Bhandari's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(42%)	42%
Won	7(58%)	58%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BVU v BVX: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Alleged Fraud and Public Policy Violation 12 Mar 2019 BVU (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	12 Mar 2019	BVU (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application to set aside the Award dismissedApplication to set aside the Award dismissed.
2	BDG v BDH: Injunction to Restrain Winding Up Application Due to Arbitration Clause 28 Sep 2016 BDG (Plaintiff)Won	28 Sep 2016	BDG (Plaintiff): Injunction grantedInjunction granted to restrain the filing of winding up applications on the basis of the 2nd Statutory Demand.
3	Gentian Shipping Inc v The "Orinoco Star": Extension of Time for Maritime Claim Due to Collision 05 Aug 2014 Gentian Shipping Inc (Plaintiff)Won	05 Aug 2014	Gentian Shipping Inc (Plaintiff): Application GrantedThe Plaintiff's application for an extension of time was granted.
4	Subiaco v Baker Hughes: Interpretation of 'Free In Stowed' Term in Shipping Contract 01 Sep 2010 Subiaco (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	01 Sep 2010	Subiaco (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedSubiaco's claim for damages was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	AP Moller-Maersk v Special Entertainment: Interpleader, Cargo Claims & Storage Charges 25 Jan 2005 Others (Respondent)Won	25 Jan 2005	Others (Respondent): Successful Resistance of AppealSuccessfully resisted the appeal against the interim order.
6	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Discovery of Documents and Summary Judgment Appeal 29 Sep 2004 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff)Won	29 Sep 2004	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedFujitrans' appeal against the decision to dismiss its discovery application was dismissed with costs. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
7	Hua Seng Sawmill v QBE Insurance: Marine Insurance, Insurable Interest & Washing Overboard 08 Oct 2003 Hua Seng Sawmill Co Bhd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Oct 2003	Hua Seng Sawmill Co Bhd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for indemnity under a marine cargo policy was dismissed.
8	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise v RBG Resources: Stay of Proceedings for Non-Existent Metal Cargoes 06 Nov 2002 Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2002	Banque Cantonale Vaudoise (Plaintiff): Application for stay of proceedings dismissedFujitrans' application for a stay of proceedings regarding the Schedule 3 claim was dismissed.
9	Feng Hang: COSCO Breached Contract by Issuing Second Bill of Lading, Causation Dispute 27 Dec 2001 MMTC Transnational Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Dec 2001	MMTC Transnational Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed with costs.
10	Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Scope of Insurance Policy for Ship Repairers' Liability 11 Sep 2000 India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	11 Sep 2000	India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs in favour of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Zarkovic Stanko v Owners of the Ship MARA: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Personal Injury, and Contractual Compensation 31 Aug 2000 Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA` (Respondent)Lost	31 Aug 2000	Owners of the Ship or Vessel `MARA` (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay the appellant under art 15 in addition to the US$420,000 settlement. Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
12	Pan-United Shipyard v India International Insurance: Ship Repairer's Insurance Claim 25 Jan 2000 India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	25 Jan 2000	India International Insurance Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the Defendant; the Plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).