James Chew Shi Jun

James Chew Shi Jun is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal procedure and abuse of process. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and fraud and deceit.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Similar fact evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
False Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James Chew Shi Jun has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

James Chew Shi Jun has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	100% of cases	BLV v Public Prosecutor: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process, False Evidence(Jan 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of James Chew Shi Jun's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of James Chew Shi Jun's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	BLV v Public Prosecutor: Adducing Fresh Evidence, Abuse of Process, False Evidence 20 Jan 2019 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 Jan 2019	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Judgment AffirmedOriginal judgment affirmed; appeal dismissed.