James E Lee

James E Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and fraud and deceit. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

James E Lee has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	19% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 19% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	3 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit Card Fraud	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Internet Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Outrage of Modesty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James E Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

James E Lee has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Deputy Public Prosecutor	6 cases	100% of cases	Rupchand Bhojwani Sunil v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & Internet Misuse in E-Commerce(Feb 2004) Tan Chee Wee v PP: Murder Conviction Affirmed - Sudden Fight Exception & Mens Rea(Jan 2004) Shan Kai Weng v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession, Misuse of Drugs Act, Criminal Revision, and Sentencing(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of James E Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	42.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of James E Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(33%)	33%
Won	4(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2004	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rupchand Bhojwani Sunil v Public Prosecutor: Cheating & Internet Misuse in E-Commerce 02 Feb 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	02 Feb 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially successfulThe appeal against the 12-month imprisonment sentence was partially successful, with the sentence reduced to six months.
2	Tan Chee Wee v PP: Murder Conviction Affirmed - Sudden Fight Exception & Mens Rea 09 Jan 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	09 Jan 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe Court of Appeal affirmed the conviction of the appellant for murder.
3	Shan Kai Weng v Public Prosecutor: Drug Possession, Misuse of Drugs Act, Criminal Revision, and Sentencing 05 Nov 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	05 Nov 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal partially lostThe appeal against sentence was allowed, and the sentence was reduced to one month's imprisonment.
4	Poh Sai v Public Prosecutor: Shoplifting Conviction Appeal Dismissed 16 Oct 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Oct 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed.
5	Goh Han Heng v Public Prosecutor: Outrage of Modesty Appeal 29 Sep 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction UpheldThe appeal against the conviction was dismissed, upholding the original conviction.
6	Than Stenly Granida Purwanto v PP: Sentencing for Forged Credit Card Conspiracy 07 Sep 2003 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	07 Sep 2003	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal against the sentence was dismissed.