James Joseph

James Joseph is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

James Joseph has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and trust law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	18% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Housing Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Succession	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	James Joseph has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

James Joseph has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Prestige Legal LLP	2 cases	100% of cases	Chong Sze Pak v Chong Ser Yoong: Trust over HDB Flat Dispute(May 2011) Chong Sze Pak v Chong Ser Yoong: HDB Flat Trust Dispute(Feb 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of James Joseph's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of James Joseph's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chong Sze Pak v Chong Ser Yoong: Trust over HDB Flat Dispute 25 May 2011 Chong Ser Yoong (Defendant)Neutral	25 May 2011	Chong Ser Yoong (Defendant): Each party to bear his own costsDefendant's position was upheld on the legal issue, but each party to bear his own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chong Sze Pak v Chong Ser Yoong: HDB Flat Trust Dispute 22 Feb 2011 Chong Ser Yoong (Defendant)Won	22 Feb 2011	Chong Ser Yoong (Defendant): Order for sale proceeds to be released to the DefendantThe court ordered the net sale proceeds held by the Defendant's solicitors to be released to the Defendant solely.