James Loh

James Loh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misrepresentation and striking out. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

James Loh has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	James Loh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

James Loh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Lee Chang-Rung v Standard Chartered Bank: Striking Out for Failure to Disclose Investment Experience(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of James Loh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of James Loh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Chang-Rung v Standard Chartered Bank: Striking Out for Failure to Disclose Investment Experience 16 Sep 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant, Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; plaintiffs to pay the defendant’s costs of the appeal, such costs to be taxed or agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.