Jamie Yip

Jamie Yip is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2001. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and medical negligence. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jamie Yip has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and estoppel.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice34% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	9% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Limitation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Ship Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Laches	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trade Marks	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Urology	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Infertility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jamie Yip has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jamie Yip has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Helen Yeo & Partners	4 cases	100% of cases	Lam Soon v Whang: Amendment of Defence, Time Bar, and Laches in Trademark Dispute(Oct 2001) Lam Soon v Whang: Trade Mark Trust Dispute & Amendment Application(Oct 2001) Lam Soon v Whang: Trade Mark Trust Dispute & Amendment Application(Oct 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jamie Yip's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.9
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2001	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jamie Yip's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%
Partial	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	40,000.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lam Soon v Whang: Amendment of Defence, Time Bar, and Laches in Trademark Dispute 16 Oct 2001 Lam Soon (M) Bhd (Plaintiff)Partial	16 Oct 2001	Lam Soon (M) Bhd (Plaintiff): Application allowed in partApplication to amend defence allowed in part. Costs of application fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore); and costs occasioned by the amendment to be taxed.
2	Lam Soon v Whang: Trade Mark Trust Dispute & Amendment Application 16 Oct 2001 Lam Soon (M) Bhd (Plaintiff)Neutral	16 Oct 2001	Lam Soon (M) Bhd (Plaintiff): Application to amend defence allowed in part and dismissed in part.Application to amend defence allowed in part and dismissed in part.
3	Lam Soon v Whang: Trade Mark Trust Dispute & Amendment Application 16 Oct 2001 Lam Soon (M) Bhd (Plaintiff)Partial	16 Oct 2001	Lam Soon (M) Bhd (Plaintiff): Application to amend Defence allowed in partCosts of application fixed at $30,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore); costs occasioned by the amendment to be taxed.
4	Harte v Tan: Medical Negligence, Varicocelectomy, and Testicular Atrophy 23 Nov 2000 Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	23 Nov 2000	Gleneagles Hospital Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against Gleneagles Hospital Ltd dismissed.