Jamilah Ibrahim

Jamilah Ibrahim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in child custody and credit and security. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and child custody.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Guardianship of Infants Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Co-guarantors	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Separate guarantee documents	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Jamilah Ibrahim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Jamilah Ibrahim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong M Seow and JYP Chia	1 cases	50% of cases	Teo v Vijayasundram: Co-Guarantor Liability & Misrepresentation in Indonesian Timber Venture(Mar 2005)
KC Abu Bakar and Partners	1 cases	50% of cases	G (Custody of Infant): Child Custody, Access, and Variation of Orders(Mar 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Jamilah Ibrahim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Jamilah Ibrahim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	66,666.67	66,666.671 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teo v Vijayasundram: Co-Guarantor Liability & Misrepresentation in Indonesian Timber Venture 29 Mar 2005 Vijayasundram Jeyabalan (Defendant)Partial	29 Mar 2005	Vijayasundram Jeyabalan (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partDefendant is liable for one-third of the US$200,000 paid by RT to ING Bank. Assumed USD as the amount is specified in USD.
2	G (Custody of Infant): Child Custody, Access, and Variation of Orders 16 Mar 2003 Defendant (Respondent)Won	16 Mar 2003	Defendant (Respondent): Application GrantedDefendant's application to vary the access order was granted (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).