Janice See

Janice See is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Janice See has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Janice See has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Janice See has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	100% of cases	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process & Mental Capacity in Death Penalty Case(Mar 2022) Pigg v Public Prosecutor: Corruption Charges & Admissibility of Evidence(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Janice See's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Janice See's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process & Mental Capacity in Death Penalty Case 28 Mar 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	28 Mar 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, in favor of the Attorney-General.
2	Pigg v Public Prosecutor: Corruption Charges & Admissibility of Evidence 11 Jan 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Jan 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.